Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;2022:1703696. doi: 10.1155/2022/1703696

Table 4.

Performance Evaluation of Distinct Runs on Proposed AICCP-TBM Method

Dataset-1
Training Size (%) Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy F-Score
K = 40 95.62 97.02 97.20 97.60
K = 50 97.00 96.44 97.87 98.40
K = 60 96.81 98.00 97.78 98.06
K = 70 96.90 97.22 97.21 96.76
K = 80 97.04 97.99 96.19 97.25
Average 96.67 97.33 97.25 97.61

Dataset-2
Number of Runs Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy F-Score

K = 40 96.61 98.09 97.81 97.88
K = 50 96.71 97.96 98.05 97.73
K = 60 97.18 96.72 97.54 97.19
K = 70 97.12 98.20 97.45 98.63
K = 80 96.97 97.53 97.63 97.07
Average 96.92 97.70 97.70 97.70

Dataset-3
Number of Runs Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy F-Score

K = 40 96.28 95.31 94.47 94.42
K = 50 95.81 94.40 96.57 93.21
K = 60 97.01 93.95 96.36 92.40
K = 70 94.94 95.31 92.34 93.21
K = 80 95.38 94.86 91.92 93.20
Average 95.88 94.77 94.33 93.29