Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 12;39(11):875–884. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001741

Table 2.

Effect of high positive end-expiratory pressure with recruitment manoeuvres vs. low positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory parameters in obese patients

Low PEEP High PEEP High PEEP
Variable (n = 79) (n = 83) End recruitment P a
Tidal volume ml kg-1 PBW-1
 Post induction 7.2 ± 0.9 7.3 ± 0.8 14.2 ± 2.4 0.824
 60 min 7.2 ± 0.9 7.3 ± 0.8 14.5 ± 2.4 0.616
 120 min 7.2 ± 0.9 7.2 ± 0.8 14.3 ± 2.5 0.840
 180 min 7.3 ± 0.9 7.4 ± 0.9 13.9 ± 3.0 0.462
Plateau pressure, cmH2O
 Post induction 24.2 ± 4.4 26.1 ± 4.0 35.0 ± 4.1 0.004
 60 min 24.4 ± 4.2 26.1 ± 4.2 35.4 ± 3.8 0.012
 120 min 25.1 ± 4.1 26.4 ± 4.0 35.5 ± 5.0 0.038
 180 min 25.0 ± 4.3 26.7 ± 3.8 35.4 ± 4.7 0.008
Fractional inspiratory oxygen concentration, %
 Post induction 0.45 ± 0.06 0.44 ± 0.05 0.44 ± 0.05 0.215
 60 min 0.45 ± 0.06 0.41 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.02 0.001
 120 min 0.45 ± 0.06 0.41 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.02 <0.001
 180 min 0.45 ± 0.06 0.41 ± 0.01 0.41 ± 0.01 <0.001
End-tidal carbon dioxide fraction, %
 Postinduction 5.4 ± 0.4 5.4 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.2 0.825
 60 min 5.5 ± 0.4 5.5 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.3 0.945
 120 min 5.6 ± 0.4 5.5 ± 0.5 4.9 ± 0.3 0.876
 180 min 5.7 ± 0.3 5.6 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.3 0.892
Driving pressure, cmH2O
 Post induction 20.2 ± 4.4 14.1 ± 4.0 23.0 ± 4.1 < 0.001
 60 min 20.4 ± 4.2 14.1 ± 4.2 23.4 ± 3.8 < 0.001
 120 min 21.1 ± 4.1 14.5 ± 4.2 23.5 ± 5.0 < 0.001
 180 min 21.0 ± 4.3 14.7 ± 3.8 23.4 ± 4.7 < 0.001
Compliance, ml cmH2O-1
 Post induction 26.4 ± 7.0 31.6 ± 9.1 38.9 ± 10.6 < 0.001
 60 min 25.6 ± 5.5 32.5 ± 11.2 39.0 ± 10.2 < 0.001
 120 min 24.2 ± 4.5 30.8 ± 8.4 39.2 ± 10.0 < 0.001
 180 min 22.8 ± 4.2 30.2 ± 7.5 39.8 ± 9.9 < 0.001

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

PBW, predicted body weight.

a

High PEEP vs. low PEEP.