Table 5.
Descriptive analysis
| TPM | Median | IQR |
|---|---|---|
| We dedicate regular inspections to keeping the machines in operation | 4.23* | 1.48 |
| We have a daily maintenance sound system to prevent machine failures | 4.09* | 1.71 |
| Operators are trained to keep the machines in operation | 4.11* | 1.67 |
| We highlight the excellent maintenance system as a strategy to achieve quality compliance | 4.13* | 1.58 |
| QS | ||
| Some working groups seek to make model changes more efficient and reduce preparation times | 4.32* | 1.37 |
| Machines and tools facilitate rapid changeovers | 4.29* | 1.47 |
| The procedure for model changes is standardized | 4.29* | 1.48 |
| OEE | ||
| Is the production department highly productive? | 4.25* | 1.44 |
| Is the production target met on time, and does it always meet the required quality? | 4.17* | 1.44 |
| No significant stops in the production process? | 4.16* | 1.56 |
| No waste in the production process? | 4.08* | 1.66 |
| OPF | ||
| Is a production batch only produced if you have the customer's purchase order? | 4.34* | 1.38 |
| Is only the specific quantity requested by the customer produced? | 4.29* | 1.42 |
| Is production at a particular job based on the demand for its subsequent job? | 4.28* | 1.35 |
| Are workstations making good use of the pull system? | 4.27* | 1.53 |
| Is the Kanban system used to authorize production? | 4.21* | 1.51 |
| ESU | ||
| Reduction of production costs | 4.39* | 1.30 |
| Reduction of administrative penalties for environmental mishaps | 4.35* | 1.35 |
| Reduction of energy costs | 4.32* | 1.35 |
| Reduction of waste treatment costs | 4.32* | 1.38 |
| Reducing the costs of rejects and reworks | 4.24* | 1.44 |
*The median has been calculated using group midpoints