Table 7.
Cosmetics removal by chemical methods
| Compound | Material | Initial concentration | Removal (%, time) | Major mechanism | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben (EP), propylparaben (PP), butylparaben (BP) | Ozone | - | 94.85–99.22% of all four simultaneously after 15 min |
Ozonation and UV irradiation (O3/UV/TiO2/H2O) |
Cuerda-Correa et al. (2016) |
| Methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben (EP), propylparaben (PP), butylparaben (BP), chemical oxygen demand COD | Ozone |
70 mg H2O2/L, 8 mg O3/L |
All parabens 100% after 120 min, COD 70% | O3/H2O2 | Gmurek et al. (2019) |
| Methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben (EP), propylparaben (PP), butylparaben (BP), chemical oxygen demand COD |
TiO2-Pt, TiO2-Pd, TiO2-Ag Ozone |
45 mg O3 | All parabens 100% after 120 min, COD 41–49% |
O3/UVA/TiO2-Pt O3/UVA/TiO2-Pd O3/UVA/TiO2-Ag |
Gmurek et al. (2019) |
| Chemical oxygen demand COD | Light/Fe0/H2O2 |
1000 mg/L Fe0 2280 mg/L H2O2 |
70% after 120 min just by the combined process, then 97.7% after SBR |
Combined light/Fe0/H2O2 and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) |
Muszyński et al. (2019) |
| Total organic carbon (TOC) | H2O2/Fe3O4/Fe2O3/Fe0 |
500 mg/L Fe3O4 500 mg/L Fe2O3 1000 mg/L Fe0 |
56.2% after 120 min | UV/H2O2/Fe3O4/Fe2O3/Fe0 | Bogacki et al. (2020) |
| Total organic carbon (TOC), chemical oxygen demand (COD) | Metallurgical waste, H2O2 |
MW 8.0 g/L, H2O2 0.05 g/L |
TOC 75% after 6 min COD 99% after 6 min |
heterogeneous photo Fenton-Like degradation treatment |
de Andrade et al. (2020) |
|
Brilliant Green Methylene Blue |
rGO/Ag2O Nanocomposite |
30 mg in 15 mL MB or BG solution (10 ppm) |
BG 75%, after 70 min MB 90%, after 150 min |
photocatalytic reduction | Iqbal et al. (2021) |