Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 20;54(3):382–392. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02701-w

Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted analysis for the association of Lp(a) levels with risk of the study outcomes

Primary composite outcome
HR 95% CI p p for interaction Adjusted HR 95% CI p p for interaction
Overall population 2.134 1.380–3.300 0.001 0.016 1.634 0.896–2.980 0.109 0.042
Patients with diabetes 1.317 0.571–3.035 0.518 1.466 0.732–2.937 0.280
Patients w/o diabetes 2.731 1.655–4.507 < 0.001 2.119 1.087–4.131 0.028
Myocardial infarction
HR 95% CI p p for interaction Adjusted HR 95% CI p p for interaction
Overall population 2.421 1.406–4.170 0.001 0.029 2.057 1.015–4.172 0.046 0.134
Patients with diabetes 1.690 0.661–4.316 0.273 2.003 0.962–1.169 0.063
Patients w/o diabetes 3.104 1.619–5.951 0.001 2.403 1.119–5.162 0.025
All-cause death
HR 95% CI p P for interaction Adjusted HR 95% CI p p for interaction
Overall population 1.937 1.076–3.486 0.027 0.038 1.249 0.636–2.454 0.519 0.094
Patients with diabetes 0.935 0.265–3.294 0.916 0.728 0.228–2.321 0.591
Patients w/o diabetes 2.629 1.371–5.039 0.004 1.936 0.915–4.099 0.084

Cox proportional-hazards regression model for the risk of the association between Lp(a) and the study outcomes; the HR were calculated for Lp(a) continuous values. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a)