Table 2.
Subset | Number of participants | Number of malpresentations | AUC-ROC (95% CI) | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 613 | 65 |
0.977 (0.949, 1.0) |
0.938 (0.848, 0.983) |
0.973 (0.955, 0.985) |
Low-cost device only | 213 | 29 |
0.970 (0.944, 0.997) |
0.931 (0.772, 0.992) |
0.940 (0.896, 0.970) |
Standard device only | 598 | 65 |
0.980 (0.953, 1.000) |
0.954 (0.871, 0.990) |
0.977 (0.961, 0.988) |
Novice only | 189 | 21 |
0.992 (0.983, 1.000) |
1.000 (0.839, 1.000) |
0.952 (0.908, 0.979) |
Sonographer only | 424 | 43 |
0.972 (0.933, 989) |
0.907 (0.779, 0.974) |
0.987 (0.970, 0.996) |
The fetal malpresentation model was assessed by comparing predictions to the determination of a sonographer. In each subset of the data, we selected only the latest eligible visit from each patient. For sensitivity and specificity computations, model predictions were binarized according to a predefined threshold. Confidence intervals on the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) were computed using the DeLong method. Confidence intervals on sensitivity and specificity were computed with the Clopper–Pearson method.