Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 11;2:128. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00194-5

Table 2.

Fetal malpresentation estimation.

Subset Number of participants Number of malpresentations AUC-ROC (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)
All 613 65

0.977

(0.949, 1.0)

0.938

(0.848, 0.983)

0.973

(0.955, 0.985)

Low-cost device only 213 29

0.970

(0.944, 0.997)

0.931

(0.772, 0.992)

0.940

(0.896, 0.970)

Standard device only 598 65

0.980

(0.953, 1.000)

0.954

(0.871, 0.990)

0.977

(0.961, 0.988)

Novice only 189 21

0.992

(0.983, 1.000)

1.000

(0.839, 1.000)

0.952

(0.908, 0.979)

Sonographer only 424 43

0.972

(0.933, 989)

0.907

(0.779, 0.974)

0.987

(0.970, 0.996)

The fetal malpresentation model was assessed by comparing predictions to the determination of a sonographer. In each subset of the data, we selected only the latest eligible visit from each patient. For sensitivity and specificity computations, model predictions were binarized according to a predefined threshold. Confidence intervals on the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) were computed using the DeLong method. Confidence intervals on sensitivity and specificity were computed with the Clopper–Pearson method.