Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 11;108(20):1600–1607. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320417

Table 1.

Summary of full-text studies

Study Study design and key enrolment criteria Setting and sample size Population characteristics Technology for AF detection Reference test
Brasier et al 201930 Prospective, multicentre
Age >18 years, capable of written consent
Supported by industry
Secondary care
N=672
AF prevalence 42%
Age 78 years (median); female 45%; hypertension 72%; diabetes 31%, heart failure 36%; stroke 16%, OAC 49% iPhone 4S; Preventicus app; 300 s recording; data quality check performed prior to rhythm analysis that used beat-to-beat changes of pulse wave time intervals and morphology Blinded interpretation of single-lead ECG by two cardiologists with group consensus; three study comparisons with PPG signal analysed at (1) 60 s; (2) 120 s; and (3) 300 s.
Chan et al 201611 Prospective, single centre
Age≥65, history of hypertension, diabetes
Supported by industry
Primary care,
N=1013
AF prevalence 3%
Age 68 years (mean); female 53%; hypertension 90%; diabetes 37%; heart failure 4%; stroke 11% iPhone 4S; CRMA app; 3×17 s recordings, baseline wander and noise filtered. AF detection based on a lack of repeating patterns in the PPG waveform, using SVM. Labelled AF if 2 of 3 recordings irregular. Blinded interpretation of single-lead ECG by two cardiologists with group consensus.
Fan et al 201912 Prospective, single centre
Age >18 years
Excluded if unable to use smartphone or had memory impairment
Supported by industry
Secondary care
n=108
AF prevalence 48%
Female 42%; diabetes 30%, heart failure 13%; stroke 12%; OAC 46% Huawei Mate 9, Huawei Honor 7X; Preventicus app; 180-second recording analysed 12-lead ECG interpreted by two cardiologists with group consensus.
McManus et al 201313 Prospective single centre
AF for DCCV
Secondary care
N=76
AF prevalence 100%
Age 65 years (mean); female 35%; hypertension 71%; diabetes 28%; heart failure 21%; stroke 12% iPhone 4S; unknown app; 120 s recording, analysed using two statistical techniques (RMSSD and ShE) 12-lead ECG interpreted by trained physicians with group consensus.
McManus et al 201614 Prospective single centre
AF for DCCV and premature beats
Secondary care,
N=121
AF prevalence 81%
Age 66 years (mean); female 18% iPhone 4S; PULSESMART app; 120 s recording analysed using three statistical techniques (RMSSD, ShE, Poincare plot) 12 or 3-lead ECG, interpreted by trained physicians with group consensus.
Mutke et al 202031 Prospective, multicentre; data from two trials (WATCH AF and DETECT PRO)
Supported by industry
Secondary care
N=1330
AF prevalence 47%
iPhone 4S; Preventicus app; 60 s recording analysed using beat-to-beat variations via a non-linear rhythm analysis, signal quality check not performed Single-lead ECG. Interpretation by two cardiologists with group consensus.
Poh et al 201836 Retrospective analysis with DCNN for AF detection
Supported by industry
Validation data from primary care
N=1013
AF prevalence 3%
Age 68 years (mean); female 53%; hypertension 90%; diabetes 37%; stroke 11%; heart failure 4% iPhone4S; unknown app; 3×17 s recordings analysed using six AF detection algorithms (CoV,5 CoSEn, nRMSSD +ShE, RMSSD +SD1/SD2, Poincaré plot and SVM) Blinded interpretation of single-lead ECG by two cardiologists with group consensus.
Proesmans et al 201932 Prospective multicentre
Age≥65 years, paroxysmal or persistent AF
Supported by industry
Primary care
N=223
AF prevalence 46%
Age 77 years (mean); female 53%; diabetes 20%; heart failure 29%; stroke 22%; OAC 56% iPhone 5S; Fibricheck app; 3×60 s recordings; signal quality evaluated using RR-interval variability analysis; AF detection based on recurrent neural network algorithm Blinded 12-lead ECG interpretation by two cardiologists with group consensus.
Rozen et al 201815 Prospective single centre
Age >18 years, AF for DCCV
Supported by industry
Secondary care
N=97
AF prevalence 90%
Age 68 years (mean); female 25% iPhone; CRMA app; 3×20 s recordings analysed using SVM to classify PPG waveforms; feature extraction used to determine self-similarity of waveform; labelled AF if at least 2 of the three recordings irregular Blinded 12-lead ECG interpretation by two cardiologists with group consensus.
Yan et al 201816 Prospective single centre
Supported by industry
Secondary care;
N=233
AF prevalence 35%
Age 70 years (mean); female 30%; hypertension 60%; diabetes 35%; heart failure 32%; stroke 19% iPhone 6S; CRMA app; 3×20 s recordings, baseline wander and noise filtered; AF detection using SVM (based on lack of repeating patterns); AF if irregular in ≥1, or three consecutive uninterpretable measurements Blinded interpretation by cardiologist of 12-lead ECG; two study comparisons of (1) facial PPG and (2) finger PPG.

See online supplemental table S1 for summary of conference abstracts.

AF, atrial fibrillation; CoSEn, coefficient of sample entropy; CoV, coefficient of variation; CRMA, cardiio rhythm smartphone application; DCCV, direct current cardioversion; DCNN, deep convolutional neural network; ECG, electrocardiogram; OAC, oral anticoagulation; PPG, photoplethysmography; RMSSD, root mean square of successive RR differences; ShE, Shannon entropy; SVE, support vector machine.