Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 11;2015(9):CD009956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009956.pub2

Bansi 2013.

Methods Design: random assignment to Ergometer Land Group (ELG) or Ergometer Water Group (EWG)
Setting: Department of Sports Therapy, Rehabilitationsklinik Valens, Valens, Switzerland
Categorization: ELG = endurance, EWG = endurance
Participants n = 60; ELG = 30, EWG = 30
Inclusion criteria: EDSS 1.0‐6.5
Exclusion criteria: incontinent, persistent infections, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, or immunosuppressive therapy
Type MS: ?
Disease duration (yr) ± SD: ?
Mean age (yr) ± SD: ELG = 52 ± 14.2, EWG = 50 ± 14.2
% Female (n/n group): ELG = 18/28, EWG = 17/25
Mean EDSS ± SD: ELG = 4.7 ± 1.5, EWG = 4.6 ± 1.4
Interventions ELG: 3 weeks, 5x per week; 30‐minute physiotherapist‐led overland ergometry training at 60% of peak oxygen uptake/70% maximal heart rate
EWG: 3 weeks, 5x per week; 30‐minute physiotherapist‐led aquatic training at 70% maximal heart rate corrected for water temperature (‐7 beats per minute). Water temperature at 28°C
Outcomes FSMC, neurotrophin, cytokines
Notes Drop‐outs
ELG: 2 immunosuppressive medication during training
EWG: 3 immunosuppressive medication during training, 3 unable to comply with daily time schedule
Measurements
Baseline, 3 weeks
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomization procedure not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation procedure unknown
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Due to the nature of the intervention, neither participants nor personnel could be blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Fatigue was self reported and therefore outcome assessment was not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Overall drop‐out rate < 15%, without indications of differences in reasons
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No selective reporting identified
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified