Table 4.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on job satisfaction of nursing staff in individual countries.
| Country by mortality rate | In many ways, my work is close to perfect. | I have great workingconditions | I'm satisfied with the work | So far, at work, I have managed to achieve what I wanted | If I had to decide again, I would choose the same job | I am satisfied with the remuneration I receive for my work | I have a very good relationship with my colleagues | I feel that my profession is important to the general public | My profession is associated with professional prestige | There is an adequate number of nursing staff on duty per patient | Satisfaction level | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Average | –0.4479 | –0.7500 | –0.2083 | –0.4271 | –0.3750 | –0.3125 | –0.0521 | 0.1563 | 0.1042 | –0.6458 | –0.2958 |
| N | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | |
| SD | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.59 | 0.37 | |
| Poland | Average | –0.6168 | –1.3925 | –0.5888 | –0.3738 | –0.2710 | –0.4766 | –0.0280 | 0.8972 | –0.4299 | –0.2056 | –0.3486 |
| N | 214 | 214 | 214 | 214 | 214 | 214 | 214 | 214 | 214 | 214 | 214 | |
| SD | 1.04 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.68 | 0.92 | 1.64 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 0.61 | |
| Germany | Average | –0.3465 | –1.2277 | –0.2376 | –0.6436 | –0.2673 | –0.2574 | –0.2970 | –0.1386 | –0.0990 | –1.3564 | –0.4871 |
| N | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 | |
| SD | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.40 | |
| United Kingdom | Average | –0.5577 | –1.0962 | –0.5577 | –0.6538 | –1.1923 | 0.2692 | –0.1538 | 0.0865 | 0.0577 | –1.4808 | –0.5279 |
| N | 208 | 208 | 208 | 208 | 208 | 208 | 208 | 208 | 208 | 208 | 208 | |
| SD | 1.27 | 0.95 | 1.34 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.26 | 1.45 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 1.14 | 0.82 | |
| Italy | Average | –1.4184 | –2.9592 | –1.9184 | –0.7041 | –0.9082 | 0.6837 | 0.0204 | 0.8776 | –2.4592 | –2.1939 | –1.0980 |
| N | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | |
| SD | 1.29 | 1.03 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 0.97 | 1.16 | 0.93 | 1.22 | 1.25 | 1.05 | 0.40 | |
| Total | Average | −0.6739 | −1.4802 | −0.6976 | −0.5593 | −0.6028 | −0.0237 | −0.1028 | 0.3794 | −0.5553 | −1.1660 | −0.5482 |
| N | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | |
| SD | 1.10 | 1.18 | 1.17 | 0.91 | 0.98 | 1.24 | 0.92 | 1.06 | 1.55 | 1.26 | 0.62 | |
| H Kruskal-Wallis | 49.586 | 193.884 | 121.803 | 8.812 | 73.417 | 74.717 | 13.575 | 105.365 | 173.959 | 170.554 | 139.703 | |
| P | < 0001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.009 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| p (Monte Carlo) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.009 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
SD, Standard deviation. Fragments of tables marked in color show the statistical significance of specific results.