Table 5. Binomial Logistic Regression of NCII Victimization and NCII Perpetration.

Variable	Perpetration
	B	SE	Wald	p	OR	95% CI for OR	B	SE	Wald	p	OR	95% CI for OR
Demographics
Gender	–.46	.21	4.58	.032	.63	.41 – .96	–.01	.26	.001	.980	.99	.59 – 1.66
Sexual orientation	–.66	.22	9.20	.002	.52	.34 – .79	.49	.33	2.26	.133	1.63	.86 – 3.10
Personality
Psychopathy	.29	.15	3.90	.048	1.34	1.00 – 1.78	.32	.18	3.29	.070	1.38	.97 – 1.95
Sadism	.41	.13	10.15	.001	1.51	1.17 – 1.93	.35	.16	4.85	.028	1.42	1.04 – 1.95
Narcissism	.07	.14	.23	.633	1.07	.81 – 1.41	.49	.19	6.87	.009	1.63	1.13 – 2.36
Machiavellianism	–.20	.15	1.93	.165	.82	.31 – 1.09	–.29	.19	2.33	.127	.75	.51 – 1.09
Attitudinal
Sexual entitlement	.06	.20	.08	.784	1.06	.71 – 1.58	–.09	.25	.13	.714	.91	.56 – 1.50
Aggrieved Entitlement	–.10	.15	.44	.509	.91	.68 – 1.21	–.17	.19	.85	.355	.84	.58 – 1.21
SIAMA	.00	.01	.01	.941	1.00	.99 – 1.01	.01	.01	1.89	.169	1.01	1.00 – 1.03
History of Perpetration	–1.18	.22	28.22	< .001	.31	.20 – .48	–1.07	.23	22.36	< .001	.34	.22 – .53
Constant	–.33	.59	.32	.570	.72	–	–3.59	.75	22.85	< .001	.00	–

Note. Gender is for males compared to females. Sexual orientation is for heterosexual compared to LGBTQ+.

History of perpetration is for no compared to yes.

SIAMA = Sexual Image-based Abuse Myth Acceptance (Powell et al., 2019) OR = Odds Ratio; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval for Odds Ratio.