Table 1.
Comparison of mainstream bone and cartilage repair methods.
Repair methods | Example | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Autogenous and Allogeneic bone | / | No immunological rejection | Chronic pain, nerve injury |
Non-bioabsorbable materials | PMMA, PEEK | 1) Rapid Curing 2) No magnetism |
Secondary surgery |
Bioabsorbable metal materials | Magnesium, Zinc | 1) Reduce stress shielding 2) High biocompatibility |
Low mechanical strength and corrosion |
Bioabsorbable polymer materials | Collagen, Chitosan | 1) Can be cross-linked or blended 2) Promote cell adhesion |
Poor stability and mechanical properties |
Bioabsorbable inorganic materials | Hydroxyapatite, Bio-glass | Poor stability and mechanical properties | Low toughness and high brittleness |
Bioabsorbable compound materials | Mineralized collagen | Better osteogenic capacity | Process complexity |