Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;22:254–273. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.09.026

Table 1.

Comparison of mainstream bone and cartilage repair methods.

Repair methods Example Advantages Disadvantages
Autogenous and Allogeneic bone / No immunological rejection Chronic pain, nerve injury
Non-bioabsorbable materials PMMA, PEEK 1) Rapid Curing
2) No magnetism
Secondary surgery
Bioabsorbable metal materials Magnesium, Zinc 1) Reduce stress shielding
2) High biocompatibility
Low mechanical strength and corrosion
Bioabsorbable polymer materials Collagen, Chitosan 1) Can be cross-linked or blended
2) Promote cell adhesion
Poor stability and mechanical properties
Bioabsorbable inorganic materials Hydroxyapatite, Bio-glass Poor stability and mechanical properties Low toughness and high brittleness
Bioabsorbable compound materials Mineralized collagen Better osteogenic capacity Process complexity