Table 2.
Prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure (CHEN) using Sensitive Analysis and Impoverishment as a result of the cost of care of NCDs among the participants
| Variable | Health Facility | X 2 | p-value | ||
|
| |||||
| Private (%) n= 173 |
Public (%) n= 175 |
Total (%) N=348 |
|||
| CHEN1 | |||||
| 5% [YES] | 98 (56.6) | 52 (29.7) | 150 (43.1) | 25.732 | <0.001 |
| [NO] | 75 (43.4) | 123 (70.3) | 198 (56.9) | ||
| *10% (YES) | 73 (42.2) | 38 (21.7) | 111 (31.9) | 16.801 | <0.001 |
| (NO) | 100 (57.8) | 137 (78.3) | 237 (68.1) | ||
| 15% (YES) | 54 (31.2) | 32 (18.3) | 86 (24.7) | 7.815 | 0.005 |
| (N0) | 119 (68.8) | 143 (81.7) | 262 (75.3) | ||
| CHEN2 | |||||
| 30% (YES) | 101 (58.4) | 62 (35.4) | 163 (46.8) | 18.407 | <0.001 |
| (NO) | 72 (41.6) | 113 (64.6) | 185 (53.2) | ||
| **40% (YES) | 81 (46.8) | 49 (28.0) | 130 (37.4) | 13.169 | <0.001 |
| (NO) | 92 (53.2) | 126 (72.0) | 218 (62.6) | ||
| 50% (YES) | 57 (32.9) | 43 (24.6) | 100 (28.7) | 2.981 | 0.084 |
| (NO) | 116 (67.1) | 132 (75.4) | 248 (71.3) | ||
| Impoverished | |||||
| [YES] | 42 (24.3) | 54 (30.9) | 96 (27.6) | 1.885 | 0.170 |
| [NO] | 131 (75.7) | 121 (69.1) | 252 (72.4) | ||
X2--Chi-square test
*
threshold according to World Bank58
**
threshold according to WHO88