Table 4.
Performance of broiler chickens from d 11 to 24 in response to different rearing methods and dietary protein level.
Gender | Protein level | BWG | FI | FCR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male | SCP | 1,138a | 1,591 | 1.398 |
RCP | 999c | 1,494 | 1.496 | |
Female | SCP | 994c | 1,454 | 1.463 |
RCP | 925d | 1,427 | 1.544 | |
Mix | SCP | 1,062b | 1,509 | 1.420 |
RCP | 946cd | 1,437 | 1.521 | |
Main effects | ||||
Rearing method | ||||
Female | 960 | 1,440b | 1.504a | |
Male | 1,069 | 1,542a | 1.447b | |
Mix | 1,004 | 1,473b | 1.470ab | |
CP level | ||||
RCP | 957 | 1,452 b | 1.520a | |
SCP | 1,065 | 1,518a | 1.427b | |
P-value | ||||
Rearing method | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.002 | |
CP level | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
Rearing method × protein level | 0.040 | 0.095 | 0.784 |
Abbreviations: BWG, body weight gain per bird; CP, crude protein; FI, feed intake per bird; FCR, feed conversion ratio; RCP, reduced protein; SCP, standard protein.
Means in a column not sharing the same superscripts are significantly different according to Tukey test (P < 0.05).