Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;10:948533. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.948533

Table 4.

Comparison of activities of daily living (ADL) functions by family characteristics in older people with type 2 diabetes in Fuzhou.

Variable n ADL H P-value
Normal (n = 1,766) Somewhat impaired (n = 165) Severely impaired (n = 85)
Living with* 28.2 < 0.001
Spouse 841 759  (90.3) 60  (7.1) 22  (2.6)
Children 298 244  (81.9) 29  (9.7) 25  (8.4)
Spouse and children 746 646  (86.6) 66  (8.8) 34  (4.6)
Alone 122 112  (91.8) 9  (7.4) 1  (0.8)
Family support* 19.33 < 0.001
Aged care home 9 5  (55.6) 1  (11.1) 3  (33.3)
Very 1,208 1,088  (90.1) 91  (7.5) 29  (2.4)
General 729 609  (83.5) 70  (9.6) 50  (6.9)
Lack 79 69  (87.3) 4  (5.1) 6  (7.6)
Family income* 31.51 < 0.001
High 1,259 1,133  (90.0) 93  (7.4) 33  (2.6)
Average 519 419  (80.7) 60  (11.6) 40  (7.7)
Low 238 214  (90.0) 12  (5.0) 12  (5.0)

*Refers to Kruskal-Wallis H test; otherwise, it is Mann-Whitney U test; H/Z is the statistical parameter of Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively; The severity of ADL was classified into three levels: normal (14 scores), somewhat impaired (15–21 scores), and severely impaired (≥22 scores).