Table 1. Root-Mean-Square Deviation (RMSD) and Fluctuation (RMSF) of PAR2, C5aR1, and GCGR and Their Allosteric Ligand in Different Lipid Compositionsa.
systems | RMSD protein, Å | RMSF protein, Å | RMSD ligand, Å | RMSF ligand, Å | RMSF of the most ligand dynamic fragment, Å |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAR2 | |||||
POPC-L | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.8 |
POPC-E | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | |||
DMPC-L | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 2.4 ± 0.8 |
DMPC-E | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | |||
POPC_Chol-L | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.6 |
POPC_Chol-E | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | |||
C5aR1 | |||||
POPC_5O9H-L | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 1.0 | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 1.5 |
POPC_5O9H-E | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | |||
DMPC_5O9H-L | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 1.6 | 2.3 ± 0.9 | 1.8 ± 0.6 |
DMPC_5O9H-E | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | |||
POPC_Chol_5O9H-L | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 2.6 ± 1.3 |
POPC_Chol_5O9H-E | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | |||
POPC_6C1Q-L | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.5 |
DMPC_6C1Q-L | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.5 |
POPC_Chol_6C1Q-L | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.7 |
GCGR | |||||
POPC-L | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.5 |
POPC-E | 2.8 ± 0.9 | 1.6 ± 0.4 | |||
DMPC-L | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.5 |
DMPC-E | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | |||
POPC_Chol-L | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.5 |
POPC_Chol-E | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 1.6 ± 0.4 |
RMSD and RMSF values are calculated based on the Cα atoms and nonhydrogen atoms for the receptor and ligand, respectively. The RMSD and RMSF calculations were performed for the ligand-bound (-L) and empty (-E) forms of the receptors. The RMSF of the most dynamic ligand fragment, involving benzonitrile of AZ3451 in PAR2, N-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-ylmethyl)ethanamine of NDT9513727 in C5aR1, and 1,3-dichlorobenzene of MK-0893 in GCGR is shown.