Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 5;2022:9385459. doi: 10.1155/2022/9385459

Table 3.

Comparison of the baseline craniocervical flexion and 8 domain of SF 36 between the experimental and control group.

Variable Group (n = 88)
Experimental = 44
Control = 44
Baseline IQR Baseline mean ranks Man Whitney U Sig. (2-tailed) and effect size (Cohen's D)
Craniocervical flexion Experimental 21 (20 to 24) 42.24 868.50 p = 0.381, d = 0.178
Control 22 (20 to 24) 46.76
Physical functioning–SF36 Experimental 35 (20 to 55) 42.82 894.0 p = 0.534, d = 0.132
Control 40 (21.25 to 55) 46.18
Role limitation due to physical health–SF36 Experimental 0 (0 to 25) 46.30 889.0 p = 0.395, d = 0.141
Control 0 (0 to 0) 42.70
Role limitation due to emotional problem–SF36 Experimental 0 (0 to 33) 42.73 890.0 p = 0.480, d = 0.139
Control 16.65 (0 to 66.7) 46.27
Energy/fatigue–SF36 Experimental 45 (30.5 to 50) 44.69 959.50 p = 0.943, d = 0.016
Control 42.5 (35 to 50) 44.31
Emotional wellbeing–SF36 Experimental 52 (44 to 60) 46.73 870.0 p = 0.410, d = 0.175
Control 52 (40 to 56) 42.27
Social functioning–SF36 Experimental 43.75 (37.5 to 62.5) 42.94 899.50 p = 0.556, d = 0.122
Control 50 (37.5 to 62.5) 46.6
Pain–SF36 Experimental 45 (43.12 to 45) 43.24 912.50 p = 0.612, d = 0.099
Control 45 (45 to 45) 45.76
General health perception–SF36 Experimental 40 (35 to 55) 47.76 824.50 p = 0.223, d = 0.25
Control 35 (31.25 to 45) 41.24