Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 5;2022:9385459. doi: 10.1155/2022/9385459

Table 4.

Comparison of the craniocervical flexion and 8 domain of SF 36 between the experimental and control group after 2 weeks of treatment.

Variable Group (n = 88)
Experimental = 44
Control = 44
After 2nd week IQR After 2nd week mean ranks Man Whitney U Sig. (2-tailed)
Craniocervical flexion Experimental 24 (24 to 26) 50.28 713.5 p = 0.029, d = 0.465
Control 23 (22 to 26) 38.72
Physical functioning–SF36 Experimental 57.5 (35 to 70) 46.6 875.50 p = 0.439, d = 0.165
Control 52.5 (30 to 65) 42.4
Role limitation due to physical health–SF36 Experimental 25 (25 to 50) 53.3 581.0 p = 0.01, d = 0.733
Control 0 (0 to 25) 35.7
Role limitation due to emotional problem–SF36 Experimental 33.3 (0 to 66.7) 46.14 896.00 p = 0.526, d = 0.128
Control 16.65 (0 to 66.7) 42.86
Energy/fatigue–SF36 Experimental 55 (45 to 60) 50.6 699.50 p = 0.023, d = 0.493
Control 45 (36.25 to 55) 38.4
Emotional wellbeing–SF36 Experimental 56 (52 to 64) 52.47 617.50 p = 0.003, d = 0.657
Control 52 (40 to 60) 36.53
Social functioning–SF36 Experimental 62.5 (50 to 75) 50.03 724.50 p = 0.037, d = 0.445
Control 50 (37.5 to 62.5) 38.97
Pain–SF36 Experimental 55 (45 to 68.87) 46.78 867.50 p = 0.382, d = 0.18
Control 45 (45 to 67.5) 42.22
General health perception–SF36 Experimental 52.5 (40 to 65) 52.99 594.50 p = 0.002, d = 0.706
Control 40 (35 to 50) 36.01