Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;9:969096. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.969096

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Comparison of proteomics profiles of human valve interstitial cells (VICs) cultured for 10 days in osteogenic medium (OM), OM supplemented with DMSO (DMSO), OM supplemented with 100 nM of crenigacestat (LY3039478) dissolved in DMSO (Crenigacestat). (A) Venn diagram representing proteins unique for biological groups compared by shotgun proteomics. (B) Partial least-squares discriminant analysis. (C) Volcano plot representing differentially expressed proteins (protein names were converted to gene symbols) of VICs cultured with OM supplemented with crenigacestat against VICs cultured with OM and OM supplemented with DMSO. Log2Fold Change, level of change in expression; -Log10P, negative logarithm of the p-value. Dotted lines cut off transcripts with p-value < 0.05 and Log2Fold Change > |1|. (D) Results of Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis of proteins downregulated in VICs by crenigacestat treatment.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure