Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 10;12(10):e064687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064687

Table 3.

Influences of different coping strategies on domains of emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and personal accomplishment under burnout syndrome through analysis of the slope of the regression line

Coping strategies
(Brief COPE)
Emotional exhaustion
B (r2)
Depersonalisation
B (r2)
Personal accomplishment
B (r2)
Problem focused
 Active coping 1.041 (0.02) −0.032 (0.00) 2.418 (0.17)**
 Planning 0.562 (0.00) −0.083 (0.00) 2.557 (0.18)**
 Use of instrumental support 1.408 (0.04) 0.269 (0.01) 0.614 (0.01)
Emotion focused
 Use of emotional support 1.803 (0.07)* 0.331 (0.02)** 0.737 (0.02)
 Positive reframing 0.385 (0.00) −0.218 (0.01) 2.224 (0.13)**
 Acceptance 1.500 (0.04) 0.237 (0.01) 1.570 (0.09)
 Religion −0.470 (0.00) −0.290 (0.01)* 1.381 (0.04)**
 Humour 2.455 (0.07)** 0.843 (0.07)*** −0.436 (0.00)
Dysfunctional
 Venting 3.771 (0.18)** 0.944 (0.09)** −0.812 (0.02)
 Denial 1.807 (0.04) 0.938 (0.09)*** −1.124 (0.00)
 Substance use 2.652 (0.01)** 0.973 (0.01)* −1.127 (0.00)*
 Behavioural disengagement 4.350 (0.18)*** 1.293 (0.13)*** −2.000 (0.07)***
 Self-distraction 2.428 (0.13)** 0.396 (0.03)** 0.885 (0.03)
 Self-blame 1.702 (0.04) 0.698 (0.06)* −1.602 (0.07)**

B denotes β-coefficient, and r2 denotes the coefficient of determination.

*P<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.