Table 3.
Influences of different coping strategies on domains of emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and personal accomplishment under burnout syndrome through analysis of the slope of the regression line
Coping strategies (Brief COPE) |
Emotional exhaustion B (r2) |
Depersonalisation B (r2) |
Personal accomplishment B (r2) |
Problem focused | |||
Active coping | 1.041 (0.02) | −0.032 (0.00) | 2.418 (0.17)** |
Planning | 0.562 (0.00) | −0.083 (0.00) | 2.557 (0.18)** |
Use of instrumental support | 1.408 (0.04) | 0.269 (0.01) | 0.614 (0.01) |
Emotion focused | |||
Use of emotional support | 1.803 (0.07)* | 0.331 (0.02)** | 0.737 (0.02) |
Positive reframing | 0.385 (0.00) | −0.218 (0.01) | 2.224 (0.13)** |
Acceptance | 1.500 (0.04) | 0.237 (0.01) | 1.570 (0.09) |
Religion | −0.470 (0.00) | −0.290 (0.01)* | 1.381 (0.04)** |
Humour | 2.455 (0.07)** | 0.843 (0.07)*** | −0.436 (0.00) |
Dysfunctional | |||
Venting | 3.771 (0.18)** | 0.944 (0.09)** | −0.812 (0.02) |
Denial | 1.807 (0.04) | 0.938 (0.09)*** | −1.124 (0.00) |
Substance use | 2.652 (0.01)** | 0.973 (0.01)* | −1.127 (0.00)* |
Behavioural disengagement | 4.350 (0.18)*** | 1.293 (0.13)*** | −2.000 (0.07)*** |
Self-distraction | 2.428 (0.13)** | 0.396 (0.03)** | 0.885 (0.03) |
Self-blame | 1.702 (0.04) | 0.698 (0.06)* | −1.602 (0.07)** |
B denotes β-coefficient, and r2 denotes the coefficient of determination.
*P<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.