Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Aug 24;41(10):2375–2385. doi: 10.1002/etc.5431

Table 1.

Comparison of 4-week-derived sampling rates (Rs, in mL day−1) derived from the Field’s Point and Buckling Point waste water treatment plants (WWTPs), and across Narragansett Bay.

Fields Point WWTP Bucklin Point WWTP Bay
Rs (mL day−1) ± SE Rs (mL day−1) ± SE Rs (mL day−1) ± SE
PFBA 3.4 1.3 10 7.8 13 4.2
PFPeA 10 3.6 11 1.9 14 4.2
PFHxA 16 5.2 14 3.1 12 2.3
PFHpA 21 6.7 17 4.1 16 3.3
PFOA 20 7.6 20 3.2 14 3.6
PFNA 15 5.4 28 4.0 23 7.0
PFDA 16 5.7 28 4.7 28 9.9
PFBS 21 9.5 16 5.2 16 4.3
PFPeS 33 12.4 2.9 3.9 N/A N/A
PFHxS 25 7.9 15 10 26 6.6
PFHpS 17 4.2 17 5.5 N/A N/A
PFOS 29 14.5 17 3.6 37 8.1
6:2-FTS 34 15.9 27 15.4 N/A N/A
N-Me FOSAA 10 8.5 N/A N/A 34 8.3
EtFOSAA 13 4.7 N/A N/A 29 13
Average 20 8.0 18 5.4 23 6.4

SE – standard error; N/A – not available

Rs were derived from eq. (2).

WWTP sampling rates were derived relative to daily composite water samples, while Narragansett Bay sampling rates were derived relative to average of two (deployment and retrieval) grab samples.