TABLE 2.
Direct, indirect, and total effects of the hypothesized model B.
| Model pathways | b | SE | t | p | LL 95%CI |
UL 95%CI |
| Direct and total effects | ||||||
| Diet → Mismatch | –2.77 | 0.21 | –13.10 | 0.001 | –3.19 | –2.36 |
| Diet → Willingness | –1.13 | 0.19 | –5.86 | 0.001 | –1.50 | –0.75 |
| Mismatch → Willingness | 0.35 | 0.03 | 9.81 | 0.001 | 0.28 | 0.42 |
| Mismatch → Group level intention | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.22 | 0.224 | –0.03 | 0.13 |
| Willingness → Group level intention | 0.36 | 0.05 | 7.41 | 0.001 | 0.26 | 0.46 |
| Total model effect | –1.51 | 0.19 | –7.80 | 0.001 | –1.89 | –1.13 |
| Direct effect | –0.60 | 0.21 | –2.81 | 0.005 | –1.03 | –0.18 |
|
| ||||||
| Indirect effects | Effect | SE | LL95%CI | UL95%CI | ||
|
| ||||||
| Total | –0.90 | 0.13 | –1.17 | –0.65 | ||
| Diet → Mismatch → Group level intention | –0.14 | 0.12 | –0.38 | 0.10 | ||
| Diet → Willingness → Group level intention | –0.41 | 0.08 | –0.59 | –0.26 | ||
| Diet → Mismatch → Willingness → Group level intention | –0.35 | 0.06 | –0.49 | –0.23 | ||
b = unstandardized coefficients.