Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;13:927705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927705

Table 2.

Participant satisfaction and usability.

(Rather) agreea (rating of 4 or 5) Partlya (rating of 3) (Rather) disagreea (rating of 1 or 2) Median IQR
Participant satisfaction
I found the intervention helpful 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 3 2.25
I would apply the intervention in the future 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 3 2.5
The skills I learned from the intervention help me a lot in my everyday lifeb 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 2 (20%) 3 2.5
I am satisfied with the intervention 6 (60%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 4 1.25
I would recommend the intervention to a friend 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 3 2
The intervention was fun to use 3 (30%) 2 (20%) 5 (50%) 2.5 2.25
Usability
I found the intervention unnecessarily complex 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 6 (60%) 2 2
I think the intervention was easy to use 7 (70%) 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 4 2.25
I think that I would need the support of someone with technical skills to be able to use the intervention 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 1 0
I found the various functions of the intervention were compatible with one another 8 (80%) 2 (20%) 4 0.25
I think the intervention was too unpredictable 10 (100%) 2 1
I would imagine that most people would learn to apply the intervention very quickly 8 (80%) 1 (10%) 1 (10%) 4 1.25
I found the intervention very cumbersome to use 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 6 (60%) 2 1.25
I felt very confident using the intervention 9 (90%) 1 (10%) - 4.5 1
I needed to learn many things before I could get going with the intervention 10 (100%) 1 0.25
The intervention was easy to understand 10 (100%) 4.5 1

aItems were rated on a 5-point Likert scale [1 (“do not agree”), 2 (“rather do not agree”) 3 (“so so”), 4 (“rather agree”), 5 (“fully agree”)]. For the sake of interpretability, ratings were grouped into the three categories of “(Rather) agree” (ratings of 4 or 5), “Partly” (rating of 3), and “(Rather) disagree” (ratings of 1 or 2).

bMissing value for one participant. IQR, Interquartile range.