Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 12;13:503. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03188-1

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Analyses of CMG parameters in various groups. Changes in MV (a), RV (b), BC (c), PBP (d), VE (e), and HFOs (f). &p < 0.05 versus Sham, *p < 0.05 versus SCI 4 W, Δp < 0.05 versus SCI 8 W, #p < 0.05 versus SCI + ADSC 4 W