| Ag/TiO2/rGO |
Hummers method |
Graphene increased the reaction efficiency to 9.4- and 3.3-fold
as compared to TiO2 and Ag/TiO2. |
(199) |
| Cu2O/rGO |
Microwave-assisted chemical
method |
rGO coating increased the activity to nearly
6 times that of
Cu2O and to 50 times that of Cu2O/RuOx. |
(198) |
| rod-like TiO2–rGO composites |
Freeze-drying and hydrothermal method |
TiO2–rGO showed CO2 conversion
efficiency of 21.38 μmol/g which
is 15.7-fold that of pure P25. |
(36) |
| CsPbBr3 QD/GO |
Precipitation method |
GO enhanced the electron consumption rate. |
(37) |
| Ag2CrO4/g-C3N4/GO |
Precipitation method |
To facilitate charge separation, GO functions as an electron
acceptor and has a CO2 conversion efficiency of 1.03 μmol/g. |
(38) |
| N-doped GO reduced titania |
- |
N-doped GO-reduced titania exhibited
an efficiency of 252.0 mmol/g toward
conversion of CO2 to CH4. |
(201) |
| ZnO/N-doped rGO |
Hydrothermal method |
The
composite exhibited a methanol production rate of 1.51 μmol/g/h. |
(202) |
| rGO@CuZnO@Fe3O4
|
Hydrothermal
method |
Photoreduction efficiency for CO2 reduction
is 2656 μmol/g. |
(203) |
| Cs4PbBr6/rGO |
Precipitation
method |
The production efficiency of CO from CO2 was found
to be 11.4 μmol/g/h. |
(204) |
| Ag–rGO–CdS |
Solvothermal followed by thermal reduction and photodeposition |
The photocatalyst exhibited successful conversion of CO2 to CO. |
(205) |
| rGO–TiO2
|
Solvothermal method |
The intimate contact between TiO2 and rGO accelerated
transfer of electrons to inhibit charge recombination and exhibited
a photocatalytic efficiency of 0.135 μmol/g/h toward reduction of CO2. |
(206) |
