| 1 |
GO–calcium phosphate nanocomposites |
Synergistic enhancement of hMSC osteogenesis |
(136) |
| 2 |
GO-based tricomponent scaffolds |
The role of GO composites was quite like that of real bone.
In comparison to other composites, the GO–amylopectin–Hap
composite demonstrated improved cytocompatibility, biocompatibility,
and ALP activity, as well as increased cell proliferation and biocompatibility.
This can be due to the larger pore size and porosity of the GO–amylopectin–Hap
composite (studied in human osteosarcoma cells). |
(135) |
| 3 |
GO–hydroxyapatite/silk fibroin |
The scaffold boosts mouse mesenchymal stem cell attachment,
growth, and the production of osteogenic gene and osteogenic differentiation. |
(17) |
| 4 |
GO–poly-(ε-caprolactone) |
GO–PCL possesses appropriate porosity and mechanical
strength. GO’s introduction improved the protein adsorption
of fibers by up to 1%. |
(138) |
| 5 |
GO–chitosan–hyaluronic
acid scaffold |
Simvastatin-loaded composite scaffolds
have shown to be biocompatible
and may be employed as an osteoinductive scaffold in place of natural
and synthetic polymer-based scaffolds (studied in Mouse osteoblast
cells). |
(139) |
| 6 |
Aligned porous chitosan/GO
scaffold |
Advantages in mechanical strength, directing
cell alignment,
shape-memory, and protein adsorption. |
(140) |
| 7 |
Bidoped bioglass/GO nanocomposites |
The biocompatibility of bioglass and its composite with GO
was improved by bidoping. |
(141) |
| 8 |
Scaffold of gelatin–alginate–GO |
Cell attachment and proliferation are improved. |
(142) |
| 9 |
Bioinspired polydopamine-coating-assisted electrospun
polyurethane–
GO nanofiber |
Mineralization cell attachment and proliferation
increases
in coated constructs. |
(19) |
| 10 |
Nano
GO |
Hippo/Yes-associated protein (YAP) activates LPAR6
and stimulates
the production of migratory tip cells via nano GO-coupled LPA (lysophosphatidic
acid) without the need for reactive oxygen species (ROS) activation
or further complex modifications. |
(144) |
