Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 28;7(40):35387–35445. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03171

Table 9. Different GO-Based Scaffolds for Skin Tissue Engineering.

Entry Scaffolds Biological activity and mechanical strength Refs
1 GO and graphene sheets GSs are more cytotoxic as compared to GO when aggregated on fibroblast. GSs are more closely connected and release more reactive oxygen species when attached to skin cells. (167)
2 PEGylated GO-mediated quercetin hybrid scaffold The hybrid scaffold had a biocompatible, cell-adhesive surface for promoting MSC attachment and proliferation. (24)
3 GO–genipin The degradation rate of pure ECM sponges was found to be substantially greater than that of genipin-cross-linked ECM sponges. (25)
4 Scaffolds of polycaprolactone/polyurethane composite with GO Adding GO to a PU/PCL composite can improve scaffold hydrophilicity and biocompatibility. (169)
5 Chitosan–PV–GO nanocomposite scaffold L929 cells could adhere on the 50CS–50PVA/3 wt % GO scaffold. (26)