Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;13:940361. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.940361

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The IPD meta-analysis for all included studies: mean CRS-R score change between pre- and post-tDCS for the treatment group vs. the control group. The Forest plot shows the positive MD both in the one-stage and two-stage meta-analysis method, meaning that active tDCS can significantly improve patients' CRS-R scores than sham tDCS. The mean differences were adjusted for the following variables: age, sex, baseline CRS-R score, etiology of injury, and time from injury to tDCS intervention. MD, mean difference; CRS-R, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised.