Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;13:956003. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.956003

TABLE 2.

Number of endorsed present and distressing items measured with the CAPE at baseline and follow-up (n = 42).

Symptom typea Number of endorsed items
Present
Distressing presence
Baseline
Follow-up
t P-value Baseline
Follow-up
t P-value
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Positive dimension (20 items) 5.7 (4.2) 4.7 (4.0) 1.485 0.145 3.1 (2.7) 1.4 (2.0) 3.978 <0.001
 Perceptual anomalies (4 items) 1.0 (1.2) 1.0 (1.4) −0.233 0.817 0.4 (0.7) 0.3 (0.8) 1.000 0.323
 Bizarre experiences (7 items) 1.4 (1.5) 1.2 (1.2) 0.980 0.333 0.7 (1.0) 0.3 (0.6) 2.795 0.008
 Delusional ideations (9 items) 3.3 (2.1) 2.6 (1.8) 2.372 0.022 2.0 (1.8) 0.8 (1.0) 4.309 <0.001
Negative dimension (14 items) 2.3 (2.2) 1.8 (2.2) 1.185 0.243 1.8 (2.0) 0.8 (1.3) 3.043 0.004
Depressive dimension (8 items) 1.3 (1.7) 1.2 (1.7) 0.307 0.760 1.1 (1.7) 0.9 (1.4) 0.973 0.336
Total (42 items) 9.4 (6.8) 7.8 (6.9) 1.426 0.162 6.0 (5.6) 3.0 (3.7) 3.486 0.001

aUnderlying item scores are dichotomized. Symptom rated as present if frequency was ‘often’ or ‘nearly always,’ and distress rated as present if score was ‘quite’ or ‘very’ in combination with frequency at least ‘often.’

Bold font denotes statistical significance after Bonferroni correction, considering p < 0.013 as significant for the total score and three CAPE dimensions (p < 0.05/4 tests) and p < 0.017 as significant for the three subdimensions (p < 0.05/3 t-tests).