Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 27;12(19):2584. doi: 10.3390/ani12192584

Table 7.

Number (n) and percentage (%) of cat samples that scored positive using each technique compared to the overall positivity to a given parasite (n tot), to obtain the sensitivity of each technique for each parasite.

Species Overall Positivity * Flotation Mc Master Mini-FLOTAC Baermann
n/n Tot (%) n/n Tot * (% #) NPV n/n Tot * (%#) NPV n/n Tot * (% #) NPV n/n Tot * (% #) NPV
Toxocara cati 10/105 (9.5) 9/10 (90) 0.98 3/10 (30) 0.93 9/10 (90) 0.98 - -
Toxascaris leonina 1/105 (0.9) 1/1 (100) 1 0/1 (−) 0.99 1/1 (100) 1 - -
Ancylostomatidae 4/105 (3.8) 4/4 (100) 1 3/4 (75) 0.99 3/4 (75) 0.99 - -
Cystoisospora 9/105 (8.5) 9/9 (100) 1 7/9 (77.7) 0.97 8/9 (88.8) 0.98 - -
Cestodes 1/105 (0.9) 0/1 (−) 0.99 0/1 (−) 0.99 1/1 (100) 1 - -
Capillaria aerophila 1/105 (0.9) 0/1 (−) 0.99 0/1 (−) 0.99 1/1 (100) 1 - -
Strongyloides stercoralis 1/105 (0.9) 1/1 (100) 1 0/1 (−) 0.99 1/1 (100) 1 1/1 (100) 1
Aelurostrongylus abstrusus 2/105 (1.9) 0/2 (−) 0.98 0/2 (−) 0.98 0/2 (−) 0.98 2/2 (100) 1
Troglostrongylus brevior 1/105 (0.9) 0/1 (−) 0.99 0/1 (−) 0.99 0/1 (−) 0.99 1/1 (100) 1

* Regardless of the copromicroscopic technique used; # sensitivity; NPV: Negative predictive value.