Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;13:713481. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.713481

Table 2.

Cannabinoid yield per cultivation area (mg/m2) as affected by plant density and architecture modulation treatmentsB.

CBDVA (mg/m2) CBGA (mg/m2) THCVA (mg/m2) THCA (mg/m2) CBCA (mg/m2) CBDA (mg/m2)
Treatment 1 plant /m 2
Control 0.94 ± 0.06a 0.93 ± 0.06a 0.043 ± 0.003a 0.80 ± 0.04a 0.95 ± 0.05a 14.27 ± 0.79a
Defoliation 0.90 ± 0.10a 0.79 ± 0.10a 0.041 ± 0.004a 0.76 ± 0.08a 0.87 ± 0.09a 13.31 ± 1.40a
BBLRA 0.91 ± 0.08a 0.92 ± 0.08a 0.042 ± 0.004a 0.79 ± 0.07a 0.93 ± 0.07a 13.99 ± 1.08a
Pruning 1.08 ± 0.05a 0.94 ± 0.03a 0.050 ± 0.002a 0.87 ± 0.04a 1.01 ± 0.05a 16.51 ± 0.78a
Treatment 2 plant /m 2
Control 1.02 ± 0.19a 0.94 ± 0.17a 0.048 ± 0.009a 0.85 ± 0.15a 0.98 ± 0.17a 15.08 ± 2.64a
Defoliation 1.03 ± 0.21a 0.94 ± 0.17a 0.047 ± 0.009a 0.73 ± 0.12a 0.80 ± 0.13a 15.72 ± 2.55a
BBLRA 1.24 ± 0.16a 1.07 ± 0.14a 0.055 ± 0.007a 0.87 ± 0.12a 0.95 ± 0.13a 19.04 ± 2.62a
Pruning 1.00 ± 0.19a 0.89 ± 0.17a 0.046 ± 0.009a 0.84 ± 0.16a 0.98 ± 0.19a 15.31 ± 3.00a
A

Removal of branches and leaves from the bottom of the plant.

B

Data followed by the same small letter within a column that includes both density treatments, signifies that the cannabinoid concentration did not differ significantly between treatments according to Tukey HSD test, at α = 0.05 (n = 5).