Table 2.
Cannabinoid yield per cultivation area (mg/m2) as affected by plant density and architecture modulation treatmentsB.
| CBDVA (mg/m2) | CBGA (mg/m2) | THCVA (mg/m2) | THCA (mg/m2) | CBCA (mg/m2) | CBDA (mg/m2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 1 plant /m 2 | |||||
| Control | 0.94 ± 0.06a | 0.93 ± 0.06a | 0.043 ± 0.003a | 0.80 ± 0.04a | 0.95 ± 0.05a | 14.27 ± 0.79a |
| Defoliation | 0.90 ± 0.10a | 0.79 ± 0.10a | 0.041 ± 0.004a | 0.76 ± 0.08a | 0.87 ± 0.09a | 13.31 ± 1.40a |
| BBLRA | 0.91 ± 0.08a | 0.92 ± 0.08a | 0.042 ± 0.004a | 0.79 ± 0.07a | 0.93 ± 0.07a | 13.99 ± 1.08a |
| Pruning | 1.08 ± 0.05a | 0.94 ± 0.03a | 0.050 ± 0.002a | 0.87 ± 0.04a | 1.01 ± 0.05a | 16.51 ± 0.78a |
| Treatment | 2 plant /m 2 | |||||
| Control | 1.02 ± 0.19a | 0.94 ± 0.17a | 0.048 ± 0.009a | 0.85 ± 0.15a | 0.98 ± 0.17a | 15.08 ± 2.64a |
| Defoliation | 1.03 ± 0.21a | 0.94 ± 0.17a | 0.047 ± 0.009a | 0.73 ± 0.12a | 0.80 ± 0.13a | 15.72 ± 2.55a |
| BBLRA | 1.24 ± 0.16a | 1.07 ± 0.14a | 0.055 ± 0.007a | 0.87 ± 0.12a | 0.95 ± 0.13a | 19.04 ± 2.62a |
| Pruning | 1.00 ± 0.19a | 0.89 ± 0.17a | 0.046 ± 0.009a | 0.84 ± 0.16a | 0.98 ± 0.19a | 15.31 ± 3.00a |
Removal of branches and leaves from the bottom of the plant.
Data followed by the same small letter within a column that includes both density treatments, signifies that the cannabinoid concentration did not differ significantly between treatments according to Tukey HSD test, at α = 0.05 (n = 5).