Table 1.

Statistical results of six comparisons between region‐based vs seed‐based SC‐SCA and SCA, and seed‐based SC‐SCA vs sphere‐based SCA based on bias‐corrected and accelerated (BCA) 95% confidence interval (CI)

Method comparison	BCA confidence interval	Superior method
Seed‐based SC‐SCA vs seed‐based SCA*	CI: (−0.1137, −0.0570)	Seed‐based SC‐SCA
Region‐based SC‐SCA vs region‐based SCA	CI: (−0.0092, 0.0290)
Seed‐based SC‐SCA vs region‐based SC‐SCA	CI: (−0.0131, 0.0210)
Seed‐based SCA vs region‐based SCA*	CI: (0.0042, 0.0716)	Region‐based SCA
Seed‐based SC‐SCA vs region‐based SCA*	CI: (0.0304, 0.0611)	Region‐based SCA
Region‐based SC‐SCA vs seed‐based SCA*	CI: (−0.1298, −0.0375)	Region‐based SC‐SCA
Seed‐based SC‐SCA vs sphere‐based SCA*	CI: (−0.0860, −0.0291)	Seed‐based SC‐SCA

The asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference between the methods.