Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;1(2):100030. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100030

Table 3.

Associations between OCT Angiography Binary Metric and Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Retinopathy Status

Metric Control Group vs. Diabetes Mellitus and No Diabetic Retinopathy Group
Control Group vs. Diabetic Retinopathy Group
C0 I1 I2 N1 N2 S1 S2 T1 T2 C0 I1 I2 N1 N2 S1 S2 T1 T2
Nerve fiber layer vascular plexus
 Reference 0.002 0.023 0.135 0.019 0.083 0.023 0.138 0.021 0.033 0.002 0.023 0.135 0.019 0.083 0.023 0.138 0.021 0.033
 Comparison 0.002 –0.002 –0.019 0.005 –0.008 0.005 –0.008 0.006 0.007 0.002 –0.001 –0.012 0.001 –0.009 0.000 –0.017 0.004 0.003
 Difference (%) 0.0 –8.7 –14.1 26.3 –9.6 21.7 –5.8 28.6 21.2 0.0 –4.3 –8.9 5.3 –10.8 0.0 –12.3 19.0 9.1
 P value 0.670 0.690 0.001 0.410 0.150 0.410 0.193 0.270 0.220 0.650 0.840 0.033 0.830 0.100 0.940 0.003 0.490 0.590
 AUC (95% CI) 0.55 (0.47, 0.63) 0.51 (0.43, 0.60) 0.58 (0.48, 0.67) 0.56 (0.47, 0.64) 0.55 (0.46, 0.63) 0.60 (0.52, 0.68) 0.48 (0.39, 0.56) 0.60 (0.52, 0.69) 0.59 (0.51, 0.68) 0.59 (0.51, 0.67) 0.49 (0.41, 0.58) 0.55 (0.46, 0.63) 0.52 (0.44, 0.60) 0.55 (0.47, 0.63) 0.49 (0.40, 0.57) 0.55 (0.47, 0.64) 0.49 (0.40, 0.59) 0.52 (0.44, 0.60)
Superficial vascular complex
 Reference 0.096 0.335 0.389 0.338 0.407 0.347 0.390 0.311 0.360 0.096 0.335 0.389 0.338 0.407 0.347 0.390 0.311 0.360
 Comparison –0.003 –0.012 0.010 –0.016 –0.009 –0.005 –0.001 –0.013 0.005 0.009 –0.031 –0.026 –0.030 –0.031 –0.031 –0.035 –0.027 –0.035
 Difference (%) –3.1 –3.6 2.6 –4.7 –2.2 –1.4 –0.3 –4.2 1.4 9.4 –9.3 –6.7 –8.9 –7.6 –8.9 –9.0 –8.7 –9.7
 P value 0.730 0.130 0.224 0.047 0.250 0.570 0.880 0.120 0.57 0.290 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 AUC (95% CI) 0.59 (0.50–0.68) 0.60 (0.52–0.68) 0.49 (0.42–0.57) 0.61 (0.53–0.70) 0.60 (0.53–0.68) 0.57 (0.48–0.65) 0.56 (0.48–0.64) 0.61 (0.53–0.68) 0.53 (0.45–0.62) 0.50 (0.41–0.58) 0.59 (0.50–0.68) 0.59 (0.52–0.67) 0.61 (0.53–0.69) 0.65 (0.57–0.73) 0.60 (0.52–0.68) 0.63 (0.55–0.72) 0.58 (0.50–0.67) 0.65 (0.57–0.73)
Deep vascular complex
 Reference 0.262 0.455 0.443 0.472 0.480 0.472 0.453 0.456 0.470 0.262 0.455 0.443 0.472 0.480 0.472 0.453 0.456 0.470
 Comparison –0.020 0.013 0.024 –0.004 0.000 0.004 0.006 0.006 0.017 –0.005 –0.027 –0.012 –0.018 –0.018 –0.017 –0.023 –0.023 –0.021
 Difference (%) –7.6 2.9 5.4 –0.8 0.0 0.8 1.3 1.3 3.6 –1.9 –5.9 –2.7 –3.8 –3.8 –3.6 –5.1 –5.0 –4.5
 P value 0.017 0.12 0.004 0.654 0.963 0.628 0.463 0.502 0.042 0.529 < 0.001 0.132 0.028 0.027 0.044 0.006 0.006 0.012
 AUC (95% CI) 0.61 (0.53–0.69) 0.59 (0.52–0.67) 0.54 (0.47–0.61) 0.68 (0.61–0.75) 0.64 (0.56–0.72) 0.64 (0.56–0.72) 0.61 (0.53–0.69) 0.60 (0.52–0.68) 0.57 (0.49–0.65) 0.54 (0.45–0.62) 0.69 (0.63–0.76) 0.61 (0.54–0.69) 0.68 (0.61–0.75) 0.73 (0.67–0.79) 0.65 (0.58–0.73) 0.67 (0.59–0.75) 0.68 (0.60–0.75) 0.67 (0.60–0.75)

AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI = confidence interval.

Reference rows indicate the adjusted mean value of the OCT angiography metric in the control group, comparison rows indicate the estimated difference between the mean for the relevant group (diabetes mellitus and no diabetic retinopathy or diabetic retinopathy) and the control group mean. Comparisons between the control group and diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy group with P < 0.05 appear in boldface. The AUC values are from models classifying diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy status using OCT angiography metrics as the sole predictor.

Adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking status, and refractive error.