Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 5;11:e77772. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77772

Figure 7. Hippocampus-wide sharp-wave ripple (SWR) dynamics through the lenses of convolutional neural network (CNN).

(A) Neuropixels probes were used to obtain ultra-dense local field potential (LFP) recordings across the entire hippocampus. Offline detection was applied over continuous simulated penetrations (8-channels). Detection performance is evaluated across brain regions and hippocampal layers using the CNN trained with a different electrode type. See Methods for the list of acronyms. (B) Histological validation of one of the experiments shown in A (red arrowhead). Scale bar corresponds to 350 µm. (C) Performance of CNN32 across hippocampal layers (96 dorsal simulated penetrations, four mice). The results of an independent one-way ANOVA for P, R, and F1 is shown separately. ***, p<0.001. (D) Dorsoventral differences of CNN32 performance across layers. P, R, and F1 values from dorsal and ventral detection were compared pairwise (55 dorsal and 55 ventral simulated penetrations, four mice). *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. (E) Example of an SWR detected across several layers (black arrowhead). Note ripple oscillations all along the SR and SLM. A SWR event which was only detected at SP dorsal and ventral is shown at right (open arrowhead). (F) Mean LFP and current-source density (CSD) signals from the events detected at different layers of the dorsal hippocampus of mouse Npx-Thy160620 (top). Bottom plots show the SWR-triggered average responses of pyramidal cells and interneurons. Cells are sorted by their timing during SWR events detected at SP. (G) Quantification of the magnitude of the SR sink and SLM source for events detected at SO, SR, and SLM, as compared against SP detection. One-way ANOVA SR CSD: F(2)=9.13, p=0.0004; SLM CSD: F(2)=9.64, p=0.0003; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. (H) Quantification of changes of firing rate and timing of pyramidal cells during SWR detected at different layers. Firing rate: F(3) = 28.68, p<0.0001; *, p<0.05; ***, p<0.001. Timing: F(2) = 10.18, p<0.0001; ***, p<0.0001.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Convolutional neural network (CNN) detection of sharp-wave ripple (SWR) from ultra-dense Neuropixels recordings.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

(A) Detailed post hoc histological analysis with SHARP-Track (Shamash et al., 2018) allowed identifying a diversity of brain regions pierced by the Neuropixels probe. The different brain regions were annotated and confronted with the Paxinos atlas. (B) Distribution of True Positive events detected by CNN32 across layers and regions of the four different mice. (C) Mean local field potential (LFP) of True Positive events detected by CNN32 at SO, SR, and SLM of the examples shown in Figure 7F. Note that sharp waves and ripples are differentially visible at these layers. (D) Detection performance of the Butterworth filter across hippocampal layers for mouse Npx-Cal280720. See the same session analyzed by CNN32 at the rightmost plot of Figure 7A. (E) Detection performance of RippleNET across hippocampal layers for mouse Npx-Cal280720. Same session as in D and at the rightmost plot of Figure 7A. (F) Quantification of changes of the firing rate and timing of putative GABAergic interneurons during SWR detected at different layers. Firing rate: F(3) = 3.89, p=0.011; *, p<0.05. Timing: not significant.