Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 15;200(12):5145–5158. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03102-z

Table 2.

Effect of MNP injection on DNA damage induced in ESC and muscle tissues

Groups Tail length (µm)
(mean ± SE)
% DNA in tail
(mean ± SE)
Tail moment (µm)
(mean ± SE)

Group 1

(control) (muscles)

5.7 ± 1.4 a 4.8 ± 0.5 a 0.3 ± 0.6 a

Group 2

(IP MNPs) (muscles)

12.9 ± 2.1 b, c,* 11.5 ± 1.8 b,* 1.5 ± 2.0 b,*

Group 3

(IM MNPs) (muscles)

13.1 ± 1.7 c,* 16.3 ± 1.4 c,* 6.2 ± 0.7 c,*

Group 4

(ESC) (tumor)

11.2 ± 1.8 b, c,* 7.3 ± 0.6 a, b,* 0.8 ± 0.9 a,b, c

Group 5

(ESC + IP MNPs) (tumor)

9.15 ± 1.0 a,b 9.14 ± 1.2 a, b,* 0.9 ± 0.2 a,b

Group 6

(ESC + IT MNPs) (tumor)

20.8 ± 0.9 c,* 31.2 ± 3.2 d,* 11.2 ± 1.1c,*

All values are represented as mean ± standard error of mean (SE). There is a significant difference between groups by using one-way ANOVA at P < 0.05 followed by Duncan multiple comparison test. The same letter means that there is no significant difference between the two groups by using Duncan multiple comparison test (P > 0.05). The different letters mean that there is a significant difference between the two groups by using Duncan multiple comparison test (P < 0.05). *Statistically significant compared with negative control using Student’s t- test