Table 1.

Comparison between stained ratio of each analyst using ARIA and those of the professional analyst using the traditional method

	Spearman’s correlation coefficient*	Mean difference
Professional	0.913	–0.010 (0.064)
Trained	0.913	–0.010 (0.065)
Untrained 1	0.915	–0.012 (0.063)
Untrained 2	0.916	–0.010 (0.063)

Values are presented as difference (standard deviation).

ARIA, Automated Region-of-interest based Image Analysis.

^*All P-values of the Spearman’s correlation coefficient was <0.001.