Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 13;13:6031. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33760-5

Fig. 3. Variability in human islet size distributions influences functional outcomes.

Fig. 3

a Schematic illustrating the procedure for calculating the effect of size distribution variability on BAP device functional outcomes. b Overlaid traces of human islet diameter probability density functions (n = 129 distributions). c Values of the number-basis shape and scale parameters (αn and βn, respectively) from b (n = 129 values; bars represent mean ± SD). d Traces of simulated human islet diameter probability density functions generated through the hierarchical probabilistic Monte Carlo model (n = 200 simulated distributions). e Schematic of the simulated cylindrical system containing islets of size distributions selected by the hierarchical probabilistic Monte Carlo model. fi Correlations of the loss of insulin secretion capacity (Ψ) to the following distribution properties: mean diameter (d¯n) (f), islet size index (ISI) (g), standard deviation (SD) (h), and volume-basis 3rd quartile diameter (i) (n = 200 simulated devices). Center dashed lines indicate the best-fit line and peripheral dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, is displayed in the bottom right text. j, k Necrotic fraction (Nc) (j) and fractional loss of insulin secretion capacity (Ψc) (k) of individual simulated islets (n = 60,583 simulated islets). l Islet volume (IEQ) versus functional islet volume (fIEQ) for all individual islets. Line of identity is shown in red. m Schematic showing that large islets reduce oxygenation of smaller ones localized nearby. n Mean islet pO2 (p¯c) versus proximity to nearest large islet (n = 14,627 simulated islets). o, p Net loss of function (o) and necrosis (p) of the islet populations in the simulated construct when islets of all sizes were encapsulated (“none replaced”, n = 200 simulated devices), or when the ones over 300 or 250 μm were excluded and replaced with smaller ones (n = 100 simulated devices). Solid black lines indicate median value, dashed black lines indicate first and third quartiles. f ****p = 3.5e–25, g ****p = 1.1e–59, h ****p = 1.2e–100, i ****p = 4.0e–88; two-sided Pearson’s correlation. o ****p = 5.7e–6 (“none” versus “>300 μm replaced”), ****p = 3.4e–15 (“none” versus “>250 μm replaced”); p ****p = 1.5e–10 (“none” versus “>300 μm replaced”), ****p = 1.1e–14 (“none” versus “>250 μm replaced”); Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA tests with two-sided Games–Howell post hoc p value adjustment for multiple comparisons. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.