Table 3.

Results of a random intercept logistic regression model (n = 1036) of variables associated with household prohibited resource collection in Chitwan National Park, Nepal.

Variable	Estimate	SE	p
Demand for forest resources
Household member count	0.05	0.05	0.35
Household dairy animals count	0.02	0.04	0.74
Household farmland size (kattha)	0.01	0.01	0.70
Barriers to prohibited resource collection
Distance from household to nearest park boundary, logged	−0.57a	0.24	0.02
Barriers to legal resource collection
Size of household’s community forest, logged	−0.42	0.31	0.17
Household’s perceived Mikania micrantha spread in forest: gradually increasingb	−0.02	0.44	0.96
Household’s perceived M. micrantha spread in forest: rapidly increasingb	0.76a	0.34	0.03
Household’s perceived M. micrantha spread in forest: do not knowb	−0.40	0.62	0.52
Community forest managers’ reported M. micrantha coverage in forests	−0.05	1.41	0.97
Measured proportion of forest plot surveys with M. micrantha present	0.09	1.67	0.96
Alternatives to resource collection
Scale at which household purchased firewood and fodder	−0.58a	0.19	<0.01
Density of nearby market/non-governmental organizations, logged	0.33	0.28	0.24
Controls
Caste: Hill Janajatic	1.05a	0.39	0.01
Caste: Dalitc	1.16a	0.39	<0.01
Caste: Newarc	0.88	0.65	0.18
Caste: Terai Janajatic	1.40a	0.40	<0.01
Household income >50 000 Nepalese rupees	−0.33	0.25	0.19
Intercept	−4.48a	1.19	<0.01

^a95% confidence interval excludes zero.

^bReference group for dummy variables is ‘Household perceived M. micrantha is decreasing or not changing’.

^cReference group for dummy variables is ‘Caste: Brahmin’.