Abstract
Background
Ferroptosis have been implicated in tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and chemo- and immuno-therapy in cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), indicating its association with matrix stiffness and clinical benefit of targeting drugs or immune checkpoint inhibitor. Here, we postulated that increased matrix stiffness reduces ferroptosis and impairs tumor immunity by regulating the expression of ferroptosis- and immune-related genes in HCC, which might be a robust predictor of therapeutic efficacy.
Methods
Using publicly available tissue microarray datasets, liver cancer rat model, and clinical specimen, ferroptosis-related differential genes in HCV-infected cirrhotic HCC and its mechanical heterogeneous pattern of expression were screened and identified. Further investigation on the underlying mechanism of matrix stiffness-regulated ferroptosis and the expression of immune mediator were performed. Finally, threshold analysis of HCC cases with sorafenib treatment revealed the value of clinical applications of these potential predictors.
Results
STEAP3 was identified as the ferroptosis-related differential genes in HCV-infected cirrhotic HCC. Stiffer matrix decreased STEAP3 in the invasive front area of HCC and the liver cirrhotic tissue. Contrarily, softer matrix induced STEAP3 in the central area of HCC and the normal liver tissue. Immunological correlation of STEAP3 in cirrhotic HCC showed that STEAP3-mediated immune infiltration of CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells and HCC prognosis, predicting to regulate immune infiltration. Overexpression of STEAP3 induced ferroptosis and inhibited the expression of immune mediator of PD-L2 on a stiff matrix. Especially, the ferroptosis- and immune-related gene predictive biomarker (FIGPB), including STEAP3 and PD-L2, predicts better clinical benefit of sorafenib in HCC patients.
Conclusions
This finding identifies matrix stiffness impairs ferroptosis and anti-tumor immunity by mediating STEAP3 and PD-L2. More importantly, coordinated with PD-L2, matrix stiffness-dependent STEAP3 could be applied as the independent predictors to favorable sorafenib response, and thus targeting it could be a potential diagnosis and treatment strategy for HCC.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02634-7.
Keywords: Matrix stiffness, Ferroptosis, Tumor immunity, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Cirrhosis
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth commonest cancer worldwide, and causes nearly 600,000 deaths each year. Approximately 80% of HCC frequently emerge on the background of liver cirrhosis by hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection [1]. Early detection and timely intervention are the best strategies to reduce morbidity in HCC patients [2]. Current multiple diagnostic methods including ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, selective hepatic angiography, and tumor biomarkers such as alpha-fetoprotein, and therapeutic methods including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery are widely used in HCC patients [3, 4]. However, HCC still has a poor prognosis and low 5-year overall survival rate, due to delayed diagnosis and limited clinical efficacy. Therefore, the clinical development of diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers is imminent. Especially, the biomarker for screening the chemotherapy- and immunotherapy-fitted patients remains exploration to guide HCC precision treatment and improve clinical benefit.
Ferroptosis driven by accumulated iron-dependent lipid ROS is a novel form of nonapoptotic regulated cell death, which was first observed in Ras mutant tumor cells by treatment of oncogenic Ras-selective lethal small molecules, such as erastin and RSL3 [5]. Ferroptosis is mainly mediated by mevalonate (MVA) pathway, sulphur-transfer pathway, and the heat-shock factors (HSFs)-HSPB1 pathway in mammalian cells [6]. Among them, the inactivation of STEAP3 (six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate 3) inhibits ferroptosis by blocking the transport of iron [7]. Recent evidences showed that ferroptosis are associated with the pathological process of various diseases, including cirrhosis and HCC [8, 9]. For example, ferritinophagy-mediated ferroptosis of hepatic stellate cells mitigates carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic fibrosis and reduces the development of HCC [10]. Moreover, sorafenib-induced ferroptosis significantly prolong the survival of advanced HCC patients [11], suggesting that ferroptosis induction may provide a promising new approach to the efficient triggering of cancer cell death. Altogether, a reasonable drug target and predictive biomarkers based on ferroptosis are required to select responsive HCC patients.
Tissue mechanics provide higher-order guidance for development and homeostasis, and are consistently modified in tumor progression. Excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and cross-linking lead to increased tissue stiffness in various cancer, such as HCC, breast cancers and other solid tumors [12]. Previous reports demonstrated that cells recognize and respond to matrix stiffness by exerting contractile force and sensing counter-tension [13]. Increased matrix stiffness promotes invasion, metastasis and chemoresistance capacity of tumor cells by triggering epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and activating the related signaling pathway, such as, Wnt/beta-catenin, TGF-beta [14–16]. Moreover, stiffer matrix regulates tumor immunity by activating immune infiltration of myeloid cells and the polarization of macrophage and neutrophil [17, 18]. Altogether, growing evidences have shown that matrix stiffness controls the tumorigenesis, progression and occurrence of HCC. However, the effect of matrix stiffness on ferroptosis and its immunity response in cirrhotic HCC remains unclear.
In addition, the tumor microenvironment (TME) contains a variety of cells (e.g., immune cells, stromal cells, endothelial cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts), which facilitate tumor progression. Among them, infiltrating immune cell interactions with other components by immunoactivators and immunosuppressors in TME can impact tumor fate [19]. New therapeutic strategies target immune cells within the TME, including checkpoint blockade and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, have proven to be a promising treatment for various cancers. Antibodies targeting other immune checkpoints, such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), now have multiple approvals in patients with NSCLC, CRC, and other cancers [20, 21]. Recent studies reported that immune-related prognostic biomarker (e.g., PD-L1, PD-L2, SFRP4, CPXM1, and COL5A1) might bring some potential implications in the precision treatment of various cancers [22–24]. Therefore, exploring tumor immune microenvironment associated with tumor tissue mechanics and ferroptosis contributes to improved outcomes in patients with advanced HCC.
Given CD8+ T cells induced ferroptosis to suppress tumor growth by IFN-γ, the effect of immunomediator on ferroptosis and its predictive value emergently need to be explored [25]. Here, we investigated whether matrix stiffness mediates ferroptosis- and immune-related genes expression in cirrhotic HCC, which participates in the regulation of ferroptosis and tumor immune environment, and affects patient prognosis and sorafenib efficacy. We first screened out differentially ferroptosis- and immune-related genes STEAP3, and PD-L2, and verified mechanical heterogeneity of these gene expressions in HCC. Next, the effect of matrix stiffness on ferroptosis and the expression of PD-L2, and the underlying molecular mechanism were determined in vitro. We further explored the clinical value of matrix stiffness-dependent ferroptosis- and immune-related gene STEAP3 and PD-L2 as predictor for prognosis and clinical benefit of sorafenib treatment in cirrhotic HCC patients. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that matrix mechanics mediated the ferroptosis of HCC cells and tumor immune environments through STEAP3 and PD-L2. Our study identifies that matrix stiffness-dependent STEAP3 and PD-L2 could be applied as the independent predictors to sorafenib response, and thus targeting it could be a potential diagnosis and treatment strategy for HCC.
Materials and methods
Patients
In March 2021, HCC tissues were obtained from the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital (CUTGH), and collected during surgery and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Clinical data were available to obtain from hospital records. This research was supported by the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) of the CUTGH and all patients were well informed of storing and upcoming use of their resected specimens for further research purposes.
Sequencing datasets
Three independent microarray data (accession number: GSE45050, GSE17548 and GSE109211) were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), and the quality of the data was assessed by RMAExpress software (http://rmaexpress.bmbolstad.com). Quality evolution of the Affymetrix datasets was carried out by affyPLM (http://www.bioconductor.org). Class comparison analysis were performed by BRB-Array tools (http://linus.nci.nih.gov/BRB-ArrayTools.html; Version 4.2.0) after normalization with RMAExpress software. RNA sequencing and clinical data of 160 normal people and 369 HCC patients were obtained from the TCGA data portal (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/). The GSE45050 dataset included 3 normal samples, 5 liver cirrhotic samples and 6 HCC tissue samples. Expression data from the GSE17548 dataset included 3 cirrhosis samples with HCV positive and 3 HCV-infected HCC samples. The GSE109211 dataset included 21 responders and 46 non-responders in hepatocellular carcinoma with sorafenib treatment in the phase 3 STORM trial.
Identification of differential expression genes and clinical prognosis analysis
The identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in normal control (NC), liver cirrhotic (LC) and HCC tissues from two independent microarray data (accession number: GSE45050, GSE17548) were detected by the empirical Bayes method [26]. A false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted P-value < 0.01 and |log fold change| ≥ 1.0 was set as the threshold for differentially expressed genes. Meanwhile, the expression analysis of DEGs was performed by using the free online web platform at http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html. Briefly, the expression of each indicated gene was evaluated in LIHC, data set matched with ‘TCGA normal and GTEx data’ set (normal tissue), with a |Log2FC| Cutoff of 1, a p-value Cutoff of 0.01, and results showed using a log2 (TPM + 1) log scale. The overall survival curves were generated by using the following parameters: Group Cutoff = Median, with Cutoff-High (%) = 50 and Cutoff-Low (%) = 50; Hazards Ratio (HR) = Yes.
STEAP3 co-expression network selection and gene function enrichment analysis
The genes co-expressed with STEAP3 in HCC were screened according to the Pearson correlation coefficient (p < 0.05) and plotted in the volcano plot by the “ggplot2” package. Heatmaps of the top 50 negative or the top 50 positive STEAP3 expression correlated genes were plotted by the “pheatmap” R package. LinkedOmics was employed to gain insights into the biological functions of those co-expressed genes of STEAP3.
Correlation analysis of STEAP3 with immune cells infiltration
The abundance of immune infiltrations was estimated by TIMER, which is a comprehensive resource for systematic analysis of clinical impact across diverse cancer types (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/), including 10,897 samples across 32 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Simply, the abundance of six immune cell types: B cell, CD4+ T cell, CD8+ T cell, neutrophil, macrophage and dendritic cell in the tumor microenvironment is estimated. The correlations between STEAP3 and infiltrating levels of various immune cells in HCC were checked. The expression level (displayed with log2 RSEM) and copy number of STEAP3 was shown on X axis, and the infiltration level is shown on Y-axis. An integrated repository portal for tumor-immune system interactions (TISIDB, http://cis.hku.hk/TISIDB/index.php) was utilized to examine tumor and immune system interactions in 28 types of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) across human cancers. Then, the correlations between prognostic genes and TILs were measured by Spearman’s test. Some other databases used are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Animal models
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees and performed in accordance with the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care guidelines (http://www.aaalac.org). 5-week-old male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were given a single injection of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight as an initiation of liver carcinogenesis. Rats were administered 40 ppm N-nitrosomorpholine (NMOR) in drinking water for 14, 20 and 24 weeks. An interim sacrifice was performed at week 14, 20 and 24. After liver tumors were excised, plane sections of the livers were prepared for each rat, processed for production of paraffin sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE).
Cell culture
HepG2 cell lines (HB-8065) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The malignant human hepatoma cell line HCCLM3 was obtained from Nanjing Kebai Biotechnology Co., Ltd (CBP60654). HepG2 and HCCLM3 cells lines were cultured in high-glucose DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin.
Preparation of matrix with different stiffness
Matrix with various stiffness was prepared by adjusting the chemical composition of polyvinylalcohol (PVA) solution according to Additional file 1: Table S1 [27]. Briefly, 8 g PVA powder (Aladdin, Los Angeles, CA, USA) was dissolved in 100 mL water and stirred for 2 h at 95 °C to obtain PVA solution. 37% HCl (catalyst) and 25% Glutaraldehyde (Ourchem, Shanghai, China) with the desired composition (Additional file 1: Table S2) were mixed to 8% PVA hydrogel of 10 mL. The hydrogels were soaked in 75% ethanol and then incubated with N′-a-hydroxythylpiperazine-N′-ethanesulfanic acid (HEPES, pH 7.2–7.4, H3375, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 45 min, and were washed by sterilized HEPES three times. Next, Collagen-I (10 μg/mL, Corning, China) of rat tail was cross-linked to the PVA gel surface at 4 °C for 12 h by the addition of Sulfo-SANPAH (1 mg/mL in HEPES, Thermo, USA) to facilitate the cell adhesion. Finally, the gels were washed twice with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) to remove unreacted fibronectin before cell culture.
Quantitative PCR analysis
Total cellular RNA was extracted from cells with the RNeasy Mini Kit (TIANGEN, DP419, China) according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Then, 1 μg of total RNA was reversed transcript to cDNA using the RevertAid RT Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using iQSYBR Green Master Mix (Bio-rad) on the CFX96 Touch Quantitative PCR Detection System. Gene expression was quantified using the primers from Additional file 1: Table S3.
Western blotting
Cells were dissolved in RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, and 5 mM EDTA) plus a protease inhibitor). Protein concentrations were quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). The same amount of protein (40 μg) was separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to a polyvinylindene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Immobilon-PSQ). After transfer, the membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk powder in TBST buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween-20, pH7.4) at RT for 1 h and were incubated with the following antibodies at the indicated concentrations overnight at 4 °C. The antibodies included anti-GAPDH (Gene ID: 2597, ZEN-BIO); anti-STEAP3 (Cat No: 17186-1-AP, Proteintech); anti-SLC3A2 (Cat No: 66883-1-lg, Proteintech); anti-GPX4 (Cat No: 67763-1-lg, Proteintech); anti-Ferritin (Gene ID: 2512, Beyotime); anti-PDL2 (Gene ID: 58205, ThermoFisher). Proteins were visualized using ECL plus fluorescence detection reagent (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Immunohistochemical staining
IHC staining was performed on representative tissue sections from formalin-fixed (4%) and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from mice hepatic tumor tissue. Simply, sections were first deparaffinized in xylene, hydrated in gradient alcohol followed by antigen retrieval in citric acid buffer (pH 6.0). After washing with PBS (3 × 5 min), sections were incubated with 3% H2O2 for 10 min and then blocked with blocking reagent (QuickBlock™ Blocking Buffer, Beyotime, Beijing, China) for 30 min at 37 °C. Thereafter, the sections were covered overnight at 4 °C using the following antibodies at the indicated concentrations: anti-STEAP3 (Proteintech) 1:20; anti-GPX4 (Proteintech) 1:50. Relevant second antibody IgG HRP (Horse-Radish Peroxidase) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, samples were developed by incubation in diaminobenzidine (DAB) Detection Kit (PV9000, ZSGB-BIO, China). The stained slides were mounted for observation and all images were taken using bright-field microscopy (Leica, Germany).
Immunofluorescence staining
Liver cancer cells with different matrix stiffness were fixed in 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde (Solarbio, Beijing) solution at room temperature for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Solarbio, Tongzhou, BJ) for 15 min, washed with PBS three times, and blocked with 2% (w/v) BSA (Solarbio, Beijing) at 37 °C for 30 min. Then, cells were incubated with primary antibodies against SLC7A11 (Proteintech, 1:100), STEAP3 (Proteintech, 1:100), PD-L1 (Proteintech, 1:100), PD-L2 (Thermo, 1:100) and at 4 °C overnight, followed by an incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG (H&L) Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibodies (Beyotime, Jiangsu) and donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 555 secondary antibodies (Beyotime, Jiangsu) at 37 °C for 30 min. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA). Images were obtained by using a laser confocal fluorescent microscope (Leica, Germany).
Young’s modulus analysis
The Young’s modulus of tumor center and invasive frontier area of HCC tissue was measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM, JPK Instruments, NanoWizard II, Germany). The silicon nitride spherical probe used in the experiment was purchased from Nanosensors (Neuchatel, Switzerland) with a diameter of 4 µm, a spring constant of 0.2 N/m, and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.5. The selected tapping mode was used to detect Young’s modulus. Finally, the Young’s modulus of liver tumor tissue was calculated by Force–displacement curves.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by GraphPad Prism (version 8, San Diego California USA). All experiments were analyzed with a minimum of three independent repeats. Statistical tests applied were One-Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by Tukey-test. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). *P < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Results
Differential expression pattern of STEAP3 in HCV-infected cirrhotic HCC
To identify the expression pattern of ferroptosis-related genes in HCC, mRNA datasets (GSE45050) and 33 ferroptosis-related genes were screened. The screening results showed that there were 1119 DEGs and 2 ferroptosis-related DEGs (SLC7A11 and STEAP3) in HCC vs. normal liver tissue (Fig. 1A, C and Additional file 2: Fig. S1A). To validate the expression difference of SLC7A11 and STEAP3 in HCC, the mRNA level was analyzed. Compared with the normal liver tissues, SLC7A11 was significantly upregulated and STEAP3 was downregulated in HCC (GSE45050; Fig. 1E and Additional file 1: Table S4). Compared with the liver cirrhosis tissues, SLC7A11 was also significantly upregulated and STEAP3 was downregulated in HCC (GSE45050; Additional file 1: Table S5). To further confirm these DEGs in cirrhotic HCC caused by hepatitis C, mRNA datasets (GSE17548) and 33 ferroptosis-related genes were screened. The results showed that there were 590 DEGs and 1 ferroptosis-related DEGs (STEAP3) in HCV-infected cirrhotic HCC (Fig. 1B, D and Additional file 2: Fig. S1B). To validate the expression difference of STEAP3 in cirrhotic HCC, the mRNA level was analyzed. The mRNA expression of STEAP3 was significantly downregulated in HCV-infected cirrhotic HCC compared with the cirrhosis tissues, and SLC7A11 was no significant in HCV-infected cirrhotic HCC (Fig. 1F and Additional file 1: Table S6). These results suggested that there was a significant difference in the expression of ferroptosis-related genes STEAP3 in HCV-infected cirrhotic HCC.
Prognostic significance of STEAP3 in HCC patients
To investigate the prognostic significance of STEAP3 in HCC, gene expression profile, mutation spectrum, and methylation were comprehensively analyzed (Additional file 3: Fig. S2). The heatmap showed that the expression of ferroptosis-related genes was mainly affected by copy number (Additional file 3: Fig. S2B). Compared with the normal tissues (n = 160), the expression of STEAP3 was downregulated in HCC tissues (n = 369) (Fig. 2A). An approximately downward trend with STEAP3 in different tumor stages (TS) and tumor grades (TG) of HCC patients were observed, respectively (Fig. 2B, C). To further evaluate the role of STEAP3 expression on the prognosis of HCC patients, mRNA data and overall survival (OS) time from TCGA databases were evaluated. Survival analysis showed that HCC patients with low expression of STEAP3 had a short OS time (Fig. 2D). These results suggested that STEAP3 was the potential biomarker of the prognosis in HCC patients.
Given mutation implicated in the survival and recurrence of cancer patients [28], the mutation landscape of 33 ferroptosis-related genes in HCC samples was analyzed. It was found that the mutation rates of STEAP3 in HCC was 6% (Additional file 3: Fig. S2A). To explore the effect of STEAP3 mutation on mRNA expression and DNA methylation, cBioPortal databases were used. The results showed that the mRNA expression was significantly up-regulated (P < 0.0001) after STEAP3 mutation, but the methylation level was significantly down-regulated in HCC (P < 0.0001) (Additional file 4: Fig. S3A, B). The altered STEAP3 was no significant effect (P = 0.431) on the survival and prognosis of patients (Additional file 4: Fig. S3C).
Given DNA methylation, most frequently occurred at CpG dinucleotides, correlated to mRNA expression and prognosis of cancer patients [29], methylation analysis with Mexpress databases was performed. The methylation heatmap showed that the expression of ferroptosis-related genes was affected by methylation, and its methylation degree was significantly varied (Additional file 3: Fig. S2C). Accordingly, a total of 3 types’ methylations of STEAP3 were obtained. Among them, cg26888222 predicted a worse prognosis (Additional file 4: Fig. S3D). To further predict the sensitive and specific of survival, the area under the curves (AUC) was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The results showed that the AUC of STEAP3 was 0.846 (Additional file 4: Fig. S3E). All the above, these results suggested that STEAP3 was associated with overall survival of HCC patients.
STEAP3 co-expression network in hepatocellular carcinoma
For investigating the biological meaning of STEAP3 in LIHC progression, the STEAP3 co-expression pattern in the TCGA-LIHC cohort was checked by deploying the function module of LinkedOmics. As shown in Fig. 3A, it showed that 3928 genes (red dots) positively related with STEAP3, and 5836 genes (green dots) negatively associated (p < 0.05), respectively. The top 50 genes bearing positive and negative association with STEAP3 were shown in the heatmaps (Fig. 3B, C). Gene Ontology term annotation showed that STEAP3-coexpressed genes joined mainly in lipid catabolic process, collagen-containing extracellular matrix, iron ion binding, lipid transporter activity (Fig. 3D–G), indicating the expression of STEAP3 are association with ferroptosis and matrix stiffness.
Tunable mechanical properties of the PVA hydrogel
To explore the effect of matrix stiffness on the ferroptosis of HCC cells, mechanically tunable PVA hydrogels were used in this study. The process for producing the PVA hydrogels is shown in Fig. 4A. Two hydrogels with different stiffnesses were used to simulate the liver at different stages (2 kPa for a normal liver, and 40 kPa for cirrhotic HCC). Given the same concentration of the PVA solution (8 wt%), the young modulus showed a highly significant increase when the stiff group was compared to the soft group (Fig. 4B, C). With the increase of the young modulus, the structure of hydrogel changed. The pore size of the dried hydrogels significantly increased when the soft samples was compared to the stiff group (Fig. 4D, E). The contact angle of hydrogels significantly increased when the stiff group was compared to the soft group (Fig. 4F, G). The PVA gels used in this study were coated with collagen I, which is the predominant ECM protein in the liver. Cells of the HCC cell line HCCLM3 and HepG2 were then seeded on matrices with different stiffnesses.
Mechanical heterogeneity of STEAP3 expression in cirrhotic HCC
To verify whether the expression of STEAP3 is mediated by matrix stiffness, two human HCC cell lines, HCCLM3 and HepG2, were cultured and checked on tunable PVA hydrogel with different stiffness (Additional file 1: Table S2). The mRNA and protein level of STEAP3 on stiff matrix gels (40 kPa) were significantly lower than those on soft (2 kPa) (Fig. 5A, B).
To further investigate whether matrix stiffness involves in the regulation of STEAP3, we firstly observed its expression in a DEN + NMOR-induced rat model of cirrhosis and HCC. HE staining and masson images showed the lesions of cirrhosis and HCC, especially (Additional file 5: Fig. S4A). AFM results showed that there was a higher young modulus in liver cirrhotic (LC) tissues than in the normal liver tissues (Fig. 5C). Accompanied with the normal liver tissues, STEAP3 expression was significantly decreased in cirrhotic tissues (Fig. 5D, E). Correspondingly, increased young’s modulus from TC to IF region in rat HCC tissues was observed (Fig. 5F). Immunohistochemically staining images showed that STEAP3 expression was decreased in the IF region, compared with the TC region of rat HCC tissues (Fig. 5G). Subsequently, to further investigate whether matrix stiffness involves in the regulation of STEAP3, we observed its expression in specimens of cirrhotic human HCC (patient number = 3). Representative picture of HE staining displayed obvious tumor characteristics in cirrhotic HCC specimen (Additional file 5: Fig. S4B). Compared with the TC region, immunofluorescent staining images showed that STEAP3 was decreased in the IF region of HCC tissues (Fig. 5H, I), indicating that matrix stiffness predisposes the expression of STEAP3.
Matrix stiffness regulates ferroptosis in HCC cells via STEAP3
To investigate ferroptosis of HCC cells, HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells were treated by 0, 1, 5, and 10 μM RSL3 (ferroptosis activators) for 24 h. The CCK-8 assay results showed that cell viability was significantly decreased with the increased concentration of RSL3 in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells (Additional file 6: Fig. S5A, B). The mRNA level of STEAP3 was increasingly induced by RSL3 in a dose-dependent manner (Additional file 6: Fig. S5C, D), indicating that 10 µM and 1 µM RSL3 is available for the induction of ferroptosis of HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells. To verify whether matrix stiffness regulates ferroptosis of HCC cells, HCCLM3 and HepG2 cultured on the soft (2 kPa) and stiff (40 kPa) PVA hydrogel were treated by RSL3 treatment for 24 h. The CCK-8 assay results showed that stiff matrix significantly impaired RSL3-reduced cell activity in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 6A). Meanwhile, stiff substrate significantly increased the mRNA and protein expression of SLC3A2 and GPX4 (Fig. 6B, C), and reduced ROS production, a ferroptosis-related downstream maker, in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 6D and Additional file 7: Fig. S6A, B). These results identified matrix stiffness as the key mediator of ferroptosis in HCC cells.
To further clarify whether matrix stiffness regulates ferroptosis via STEAP3 in HCC cells, overexpression of STEAP3 in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells were performed. The results of qRT-PCR and western blot showed that overexpression of STEAP3 significantly inhibited the expression of GPX4 and ferritin on a stiff matrix (Fig. 6E, F). To evaluate STEAP3 functions as a ferrireductase, the level of ROS production was quantified by DCFH-DA in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells. The results showed that the level of ROS was significantly up-regulated in STEAP3-overexpressed HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 6G). Subsequently, the CCK-8 assay results showed that overexpression of STEAP3 significantly enhanced RSL3-reduced cell viability in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 6H). Collectively, these results suggested that matrix stiffness suppressed ferroptosis in HCC cells by downregulating STEAP3.
STEAP3 is correlated with immune infiltration in HCC
To further explore whether STEAP3 mediate immune infiltration, the correlation analysis was performed. The results showed that there was no significant relationship between immune infiltration of B cell, CD4+ T cell, CD8+ T cell, macrophage, dendritic cell, and neutrophil, and HCC patient survival (Fig. 7A). However, the mRNA level of STEAP3 was negatively correlated with tumor purity and the infiltration of CD8+ T cell, macrophage and dendritic cell, but positively correlated with CD4+ T cell and neutrophil (Fig. 7B). Unexpectedly, copy number of STEAP3 had no significant effect on the immune infiltration level of immune cell (Fig. 7C). Subsequently, tumor immunologically quiet, TGF-β dominant and molecular subtypes of HCC patients were analyzed. The results showed that the expression of STEAP3 was significantly correlated with immune and molecular subtypes (Fig. 7D, E). Taken together, these results demonstrated that STEAP3 directed immune microenvironment through immune infiltration in cirrhotic HCC, indicating its association with tumor immunity.
STEAP3 mediate immunogulator PD-L2 expression in HCC
Previous studies have proved immune checkpoints as a therapeutic target in malignancies [30]. To investigate whether STEAP3 direct tumor immunity, gene expression profile analysis of all immune checkpoints in HCC patients was firstly checked. Compared with the normal liver tissues, there was a significantly increased expression of PD-L2 (PDCD1LG2), CTLA4, HAVCR2, PDCD1, TIGIT and Siglec-15 in HCC patients, (Fig. 8A). Subsequently, the analysis results of q-PCR showed that stiff substrate significantly increased the gene expression of PD-L2 in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells in vitro (Fig. 8B). To further evaluate the relation between matrix stiffness and PD-L2, a liver cirrhotic rat model and human cirrhotic HCC specimens were used (n = 3). Accompanied with the normal liver tissues and TC region, PD-L2 expression was significantly increased in cirrhotic tissues (Fig. 8C) and in the IF region of HCC tissues, respectively (Fig. 8D, E). Unexpectedly, there was no significantly differences for PD-L1 (CD274) in cirrhosis tissues compared with normal liver tissue. However, accompanied with the TC region, PD-L1 expression was significantly decreased in the IF region of HCC tissues. To further identify its correlation with STEAP3, the analysis of correlation coefficients was performed. The results showed that PD-L1 and PD-L2 were significant correlation with STEAP3 (Additional file 8: Fig. S7A, B). Overexpression of STEAP3 significantly suppressed the expression of PD-L2 in HCCLM3 and HepG2 cells cultured on a stiff matrix (Fig. 8G). Similarly, there were no significant differences for PD-L1 (Fig. 8F). Generally, these results suggested STEAP3 could affect tumor immune microenvironment via regulating matrix stiffness-dependent immune checkpoint receptor PD-L2 in HCC cells.
STEAP3 supplemented with PD-L2 predict clinical benefit of sorafenib treatment in HCC patients
To evaluate the predictive value of STEAP3, public datasets from HCC patients with sorafenib treatment in the phase 3 STORM clinical trial was analyzed. Compared with non-responders (n = 46), the decreased levels of STEAP3 was observed in HCC responders (n = 21) following sorafenib therapy (GSE109211; Fig. 9A and Additional file 1: Table S7). To further validate it, taking the average value of STEAP3 (438.5) in non-responders as the predictive threshold, the value above the threshold was considered as high expression, and the value below the threshold considered as low expression. When it was higher than 438.5 for STEAP3, the number of responders were 1, and in non-responders were 19, respectively (Fig. 9B, C). The statistic results showed that the accuracy of these biomarkers (STEAP3) was 95.0% in non-responsive HCC patients with sorafinib therapy (Fig. 9D), indicating that high STEAP3 might be an independent biomarker of non-responder to sorafenib in HCC patients.
To improve the accuracy of prediction, based on low expression of STEAP3, matrix-dependent immune checkpoint receptor PD-L2 was used as supplementary predictive biomarker. Compared with non-responders (n = 46), the reduced expression of PD-L2 in sorafenib responders (n = 21) was observed (Fig. 9E and Additional file 1: Table S7). As above, the average value of PD-L2 (85.2) in responders was taken as the predictive threshold. When it was higher than 85.2 for PD-L2, the number of HCC sorafinib responders with in non-responders was 17 (total 20), indicating that low STEAP3/high PDL2 might also be independent biomarkers of non-responder to sorafenib in HCC patients. The number of sorafinib responders in HCC patients with low STEAP3/low PDL2 was 17 (total 27) (Fig. 9F, G), indicating that HCC patients with low PD-L2 have better clinic benefit to sorafinib. The statistic results showed that the accuracy of these biomarkers (STEAP3 and PD-L2) were 63.0% and 85.0% in responsive and non-responsive HCC patients with sorafinib therapy, respectively (Fig. 9H).
Discussion
Previous evidences proposed that mechanical cues (e.g., matrix stiffness) of the environment orchestrates the pathogenesis and development in various cancers, including HCC, and breast cancers as well as other solid cancers [15, 31]. Ferroptosis contribute to tumorigenesis and tumor progression in HCC caused mainly liver cirrhosis, which has frequently been a potential target of chemo- and immuno-therapy [32]. However, the role of matrix stiffness on the regulation of ferroptosis and tumor immunity in HCC, and its underlying mechanism and clinical value remain elusive. Here, we identified that matrix stiffness suppressed ferroptosis of HCC cells through regulating the expression of STEAP3, which in turn shaped matrix mechanic-driven tumor immunity environment in HCC partly via PD-L2. Especially, we developed a ferroptosis- and immunity-related gene to predict a better clinical benefit to sorafenib in HCC patients (Fig. 10).
Sorafenib treatment has proven to be an effective treatment for advanced HCC patients [33]. Given that the overall response rate from sorafenib therapy is still very low [34], the identification of patients who can benefit most from these treatment is crucial. Although different prognostic or predictive biomarkers have been provided for HCC patients, a validated biomarker for predicting clinical benefits to sorafenib therapy still need to be found. Previous studies showed that multiple genes affect the development and chemotherapy resistance of tumors [35], and multivariate threshold analysis is an important approach that can help uncover candidate biomarkers or therapeutic targets [36]. In this study, based on public available ferroptosis- and immune-related gene datasets, we identified that the expression of matrix stiffness-dependent ferroptosis and immune hub genes affected HCC patients’ response to sorafenib. With the limitation of clinical cases and the lack of patient’s clinical data, such as survival time and tumor subtype, more studies remain need for clarifying.
Ferroptosis is a novel non-apoptotic form of cell death through inhibiting activating STEAP3-mediated lipid peroxidation by iron-dependent lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) [5]. Here, we verified that matrix stiffness reduces STEAP3 expression to suppress ferroptosis of HCC cells, indicating matrix stiffness promotes HCC growth. This results are consistent with previous reports of STEAP3. STEAP3 is a major ferric reductase, which suppresses ferroptosis through deoxidizing Fe3+ to Fe2+ [37]. The reduction of STEAP3 impairs ferroptosis of tumor cells and promotes HCC progression [38]. In addition, we also demonstrated that matrix stiffness induces the expression of GPX4, a central regulator of ferroptosis-triggering mechanisms, and impairs the accumulation of ROS in HCC cells. Given the inhibition of glutathione biosynthesis and iron-dependent accumulation of lipid peroxidation kills cells undergoing ferroptosis, both glutathione biosynthesis and iron metabolism are two critical processes involved in the mechanism of ferroptosis. Therefore, our results verified that tissue mechanical cues direct ferroptosis of HCC cells in these two aspects.
Mechanical features of liver tissues play a vital role not only in tuning of physiological liver functions but also in its pathological progression. Accordingly, mechanical factors of liver tissues have been provoked as diagnostic markers and potential therapeutic targets [39, 40]. In HCC tissues, matrix stiffness from tumor central (TC) to invasion frontier (IF) area is gradually harden [41]. Consisted with this studies, our results showed an increased matrix stiffness in liver tumor tissue of DEN-induced rats. The stiffness of normal human liver tissue was shown to be approximately less than 2.5 kPa in physiological conditions, increasing to 2.5–12.5 kPa in fibrotic liver tissues, and 12.5–75 kPa in cirrhotic HCC tissues [13]. Consisted with previous studies, our results showed an increased matrix stiffness in fribrosis tissue of DEN-induced rats. Recently, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate or other matrix gel have been designed to represent the stiffness of healthy (1–2.5 kPa) and diseased livers (10–55 kPa), respectively. Indeed, we here observed that the 40 kPa (TC) PVA substrates induces SLC7A11 expression and reduces STEAP3 expression in human HCC cells in vitro, compared with 2 kPa (IF). Similarly, we demonstrated that matrix stiffness induced the expression of immune checkpoint receptor PD-L2, not PD-L1, indicating PD-L2-dependent less anti-tumor immunity in IF area. Previous studies have demonstrated that SLC3A2 (CD98hc), ubiquitously expressed heavy subunit of heteromeric amino acid transporters that bind to an SLC7 family member (e.g., SLC7A11), was required for ECM to fully exert its structural and contributed to carcinogene [42, 43]. Overexpression of CD98hc occurs widely in HCC cells, and is associated with poor prognosis clinically [44]. Here, we observed that the expression of CD98hc was promoted by stiffer matrix. Therefore, we suspected that matrix stiffness might mediate ferroptosis to promote HCC development partly via CD98hc. In addition, many positive and negative regulators (e.g., p53, ATF3/4, Nrf2, STAT3 and BAP1) have been identified in regulating the expression and activity of SLC7A11 and STEAP3 [45–48].
Additionally, cancer immuno-therapy and prediction based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has achieved considerable success in the clinic [49]. However, the clinical application of ICIs was significantly limited by the fact that less than one-third of patients with most types of cancer respond to these agents. As most tumors harbor innate resistance to apoptosis, the induction of ferroptosis has gradually emerged as a novel cancer treatment strategy. Previous studies reported that STEAP3 have been implicated in the regulation of immune response in various cell types [37]. Consistent with previous studies, our results showed that the gene feature (expression level and copy number) of STEAP3 was closely correlated with the numbers of tumor-infiltrated immune cells (e.g., CD8+ T cells) in HCC. Overexpression STEAP3 impaired the expression of PD-L2 on stiffer matrix in vitro. This results indicated that STEAP3 and PD-L2 may play a synergistic role in HCC immune microenvironment. It was reported that PD-L2 expression was observed in other solid tumors, with expression detected in the absence of PD-L1 in some samples, and varied results regarding its relationship with clinical response [22]. Similarly, we demonstrated that, based on ferroptosis-related genes, PD-L2 can be used as supplementary predictive biomarker to clinical prediction of sorafenib treatment. Further understanding the landscape of tumor immune environments would be needed to help in finding new ways to treat HCC or to alter it to improve clinical benefits of chemotherapies and immunotherapies.
We and others have shown that matrix stiffness is a elegant physical environment cues constantly being challenged in physiology and disease [50]. Although the underlying mechanism remains unclear, the occurrence of ferroptosis and anti-tumor immunity inhibition associated with matrix stiffness is likely to be a common phenomenon. In normal tissues, environment factors would trigger cellular ferroptosis and adaptive immunity, contributing to developmental programs and tissue homeostasis, or even facilitating in tissue fibrosis and tumorgenesis. In contrast, in tumor tissues, in which the proliferative arrest and anti-tumor immunity has been lost, matrix stiffness-inhibited ferroptosis and immune evasion in the IF area of tumor would lead to an aberrant tumor growth, and metastasis as well as drug resistance.
Conclusions
Our findings identify that STEAP3 characterize matrix mechanical heterogeneity and immune environment of tumor, and possess prognosis and predictive value of clinical outcome in cirrhotic HCC. Particularly, matrix stiffness impairs ferroptosis by downregulating STEAP3 in cirrhotic HCC, which in turn direct the infiltration of tumor immune cells, and exacerbate anti-tumor immunity partly via PD-L2. This finding provides a novel insights and clinical application on ferroptosis, illustrating STEAP3 supplemented with PD-L2 as the potential therapeutic targets and predictive biomarker for cirrhotic HCC. In conclusion, ferroptosis- and immune-related gene is a promising predictive biomarker for favorable sorafenib response in HCC patients.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Number 11832008 and 32101053] and the Visiting Scholar Foundation of Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology (Chongqing University), Ministry of Education [CQKLBST-2017-001].
Abbreviations
- HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- LC
Liver cirrhotic
- NC
Normal group
- HBV
Hepatitis B virus
- HCV
Hepatitis C virus
- DEGs
Differentially expressed genes
- GEO
Gene Expression Omnibus
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- TS
Tumor stages
- TG
Tumor grades
- OS
Overall survival
- TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
- PVA
Polyvinylalcohol
- DEN
Diethylnitrosamine
- NMORN
Nitrosomorpholine
- IHC
Immunohistochemical
- ROC
Receiver operating characteristic
- AUC
Area under the curve
- GPX4
Glutathione peroxidase 4
- SLC3A2
Solute carrier family 3 member 2
- FIGPB
Ferroptosis- and immune-related gene predictive biomarker
Author contributions
WL, SW and LC conceived the study. SW performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. LC supported the bioinformatics technique. WL and LC provided the financial support. WL, SW and LC check all the typing in manuscript, as well as the responses to reviewers. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data in the work of this manuscript and preparation of the manuscript are funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11832008 and 32101053) and the Visiting Scholar Foundation of Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology (Chongqing University), Ministry of Education [CQKLBST-2017-001].
Availability of data and materials
All data associated with this study are present in the paper or the Additional files.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Animal studies were supported by the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) of the CUTGH. These sequencing datasets were obtained from GEO database, a public database.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with regard to this manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Shunxi Wang, Long Chen contributed equally to this work
References
- 1.Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(15):1450–1462. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1713263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yoshida N, Doyama H, Yano T, Horimatsu T, Uedo N, Yamamoto Y, Kakushima N, Kanzaki H, Hori S, Yao K, Oda I, Katada C, Yokoi C, Ohata K, Yoshimura K, Ishikawa H, Muto M. Early gastric cancer detection in high-risk patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial on the effect of second-generation narrow band imaging. Gut. 2021;70:67–75. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Carlis L, Pirotta V, Rondinara GF, Sansalone CV, Colella G, Maione G, Slim AO, Rampoldi A, Cazzulani A, Belli L, Forti D. Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: diagnosis and criteria for treatment. Liver Transpl Surg. 1997;3:160–165. doi: 10.1002/lt.500030209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li L, Diao W, Zen K. Micro-ribonucleic acids: potential noninvasive biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2014;1:21–33. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S44463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, Patel DN, Bauer AJ, Cantley AM, Yang WS, Morrison B, Stockwell BR. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hassannia B, Vandenabeele P, VandenBerghe T. Targeting ferroptosis to iron out cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;35:830–849. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Caillot F, Daveau R, Daveau M, Lubrano J, Saint-Auret G, Hiron M, Goria O, Scotte M, Francois A, Salier J-P. Down-regulated expression of the TSAP6 protein in liver is associated with a transition from cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Histopathology. 2009;54:319–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03224.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu S, He Y, Lin L, Chen P, Chen M, Zhang S. The emerging role of ferroptosis in intestinal disease. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(4):289. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03559-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen J, Li X, Ge C, Min J, Wang F. The multifaceted role of ferroptosis in liver disease. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(3):467–480. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00941-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Z, Yao Z, Wang L, Ding H, Shao J, Chen A, Zhang F, Zheng S. Activation of ferritinophagy is required for the RNA-binding protein ELAVL1/HuR to regulate ferroptosis in hepatic stellate cells. Autophagy. 2018;14:2083–2103. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1503146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun X, Niu X, Chen R, He W, Chen D, Kang R, Tang D. Metallothionein-1G facilitates sorafenib resistance through inhibition of ferroptosis. Hepatology. 2016;64:488–500. doi: 10.1002/hep.28574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Piersma B, Hayward MK, Weaver VM. Fibrosis and cancer: a strained relationship. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020;1873:188356. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen G, Xia B, Fu Q, Huang X, Wang F, Chen Z, Lv Y. Matrix mechanics as regulatory factors and therapeutic targets in hepatic fibrosis. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15:2509–2521. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.37500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Saatci O, Kaymak A, Raza U, Ersan PG, Akbulut O, Banister CE, Sikirzhytski V, Tokat UM, Aykut G, Ansari SA, Dogan HT, Dogan M, Jandaghi P, Isik A, Gundogdu F, Kosemehmetoglu K, Dizdar O, Aksoy S, Akyol A, Uner A, Buckhaults PJ, Riazalhosseini Y, Sahin O. Targeting lysyl oxidase (LOX) overcomes chemotherapy resistance in triple negative breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2416. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16199-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dong Y, Zheng Q, Wang Z, Lin X, You Y, Wu S, Wang Y, Hu C, Xie X, Chen J, Gao D, Zhao Y, Wu W, Liu Y, Ren Z, Chen R, Cui J. Higher matrix stiffness as an independent initiator triggers epithelial–mesenchymal transition and facilitates HCC metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:112. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0795-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yoshida GJ. Regulation of heterogeneous cancer-associated fibroblasts: the molecular pathology of activated signaling pathways. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:112. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01611-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Alonso-Nocelo M, Raimondo TM, Vining KH, López-López R, de la Fuente M, Mooney DJ. Matrix stiffness and tumor-associated macrophages modulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition of human adenocarcinoma cells. Biofabrication. 2018;10:035004. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aaafbc. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stroka KM, Aranda-Espinoza H. Endothelial cell substrate stiffness influences neutrophil transmigration via myosin light chain kinase-dependent cell contraction. Blood. 2011;118:1632–1640. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-321125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hinshaw DC, Shevde LA. The tumor microenvironment innately modulates cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2019;79:4557–4566. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Osipov A, Saung MT, Zheng L, Murphy AG. Small molecule immunomodulation: the tumor microenvironment and overcoming immune escape. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:224. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0667-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Feins S, Kong W, Williams EF, Milone MC, Fraietta JA. An introduction to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:S3–s9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yearley JH, Gibson C, Yu N, Moon C, Murphy E, Juco J, Lunceford J, Cheng J, Chow LQM, Seiwert TY, Handa M, Tomassini JE, McClanahan T. PD-L2 expression in human tumors: relevance to anti-PD-1 therapy in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:3158–3167. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhao SG, Lehrer J, Chang SL, Das R, Erho N, Liu Y, Sjöström M, Den RB, Freedland SJ, Klein EA, Karnes RJ, Schaeffer EM, Xu M, Speers C, Nguyen PL, Ross AE, Chan JM, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Davicioni E, Fong L, Spratt DE, Feng FY. The immune landscape of prostate cancer and nomination of PD-L2 as a potential therapeutic target. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:301–310. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Roemer MG, Advani RH, Ligon AH, Natkunam Y, Redd RA, Homer H, Connelly CF, Sun HH, Daadi SE, Freeman GJ, Armand P, Chapuy B, de Jong D, Hoppe RT, Neuberg DS, Rodig SJ, Shipp MA. PD-L1 and PD-L2 genetic alterations define classical hodgkin lymphoma and predict outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2690–2697. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.4482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang W, Green M, Choi JE, Gijón M, Kennedy PD, Johnson JK, Liao P, Lang X, Kryczek I, Sell A, Xia H, Zhou J, Li G, Li J, Li W, Wei S, Vatan L, Zhang H, Szeliga W, Gu W, Liu R, Lawrence TS, Lamb C, Tanno Y, Cieslik M, Stone E, Georgiou G, Chan TA, Chinnaiyan A, Zou W. CD8 T cells regulate tumour ferroptosis during cancer immunotherapy. Nature. 2019;569:270–274. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1170-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8:118–127. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xia T, Zhao R, Liu W, Huang Q, Chen P, Waju YN, Al-Ani MK, Lv Y, Yang L. Effect of substrate stiffness on hepatocyte migration and cellular Young’s modulus. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:6996–7006. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Soumerai TE, Donoghue MTA, Bandlamudi C, Srinivasan P, Chang MT, Zamarin D, Cadoo KA, Grisham RN, O'Cearbhaill RE, Tew WP, Konner JA, Hensley ML, Makker V, Sabbatini P, Spriggs DR, Troso-Sandoval TA, Charen AS, Friedman C, Gorsky M, Schweber SJ, Middha S, Murali R, Chiang S, Park KJ, Soslow RA, Ladanyi M, Li BT, Mueller J, Weigelt B, Zehir A, Berger MF, Abu-Rustum NR, Aghajanian C, DeLair DF, Solit DB, Taylor BS, Hyman DM. Clinical utility of prospective molecular characterization in advanced endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:5939–5947. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:23–38. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sahin U, Oehm P, Derhovanessian E, Jabulowsky RA, Vormehr M, Gold M, Maurus D, Schwarck-Kokarakis D, Kuhn AN, Omokoko T, Kranz LM, Diken M, Kreiter S, Haas H, Attig S, Rae R, Cuk K, Kemmer-Brück A, Breitkreuz A, Tolliver C, Caspar J, Quinkhardt J, Hebich L, Stein M, Hohberger A, Vogler I, Liebig I, Renken S, Sikorski J, Leierer M, Müller V, Mitzel-Rink H, Miederer M, Huber C, Grabbe S, Utikal J, Pinter A, Kaufmann R, Hassel JC, Loquai C, Türeci Ö. An RNA vaccine drives immunity in checkpoint-inhibitor-treated melanoma. Nature. 2020;585:107–112. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2537-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chang TT, Thakar D, Weaver VM. Force-dependent breaching of the basement membrane. Matrix Biol. 2017;57–58:178–189. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lei G, Mao C, Yan Y, Zhuang L, Gan B. Ferroptosis, radiotherapy, and combination therapeutic strategies. Protein Cell. 2021;12(11):836–857. doi: 10.1007/s13238-021-00841-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kudo M, Ueshima K, Ikeda M, Torimura T, Tanabe N, Aikata H, Izumi N, Yamasaki T, Nojiri S, Hino K, Tsumura H, Kuzuya T, Isoda N, Yasui K, Aino H, Ido A, Kawabe N, Nakao K, Wada Y, Yokosuka O, Yoshimura K, Okusaka T, Furuse J, Kokudo N, Okita K, Johnson PJ, Arai Y. Randomised, multicentre prospective trial of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib as compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: TACTICS trial. Gut. 2020;69:1492–1501. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cheng Z, Wei-Qi J, Jin D. New insights on sorafenib resistance in liver cancer with correlation of individualized therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020;1874:188382. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen Y, Li Z-Y, Zhou G-Q, Sun Y. An immune-related gene prognostic index for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:330–341. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.De Angelis C, Nagi C, Hoyt CC, Liu L, Roman K, Wang C, Zheng Y, Veeraraghavan J, Sethunath V, Nuciforo P, Wang T, Tsimelzon A, Mao S, Hilsenbeck SG, Trivedi MV, Cataldo ML, Pavlick A, Wolff AC, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, Prat A, Gutierrez C, Osborne CK, Rimawi MF, Schiff R. Evaluation of the predictive role of tumor immune infiltrate in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy without chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:738–745. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guo W-Z, Fang H-B, Cao S-L, Chen S-Y, Li J, Shi J-H, Tang H-W, Zhang Y, Wen P-H, Zhang J-K, Wang Z-H, Shi X-Y, Pang C, Yang H, Hu B-W, Zhang S-J. Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 3 deficiency in hepatocytes protects the liver against ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppressing transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1. Hepatology. 2020;71:1037–1054. doi: 10.1002/hep.30882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhao N, Huang Y, Wang Y-H, Muir RK, Chen Y-C, Wei J, Hooshdaran N, Viswanath P, Seo Y, Ruggero D, Renslo AR, Evans MJ. Ferronostics: measuring tumoral ferrous iron with PET to predict sensitivity to iron-targeted cancer therapies. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:949–955. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.252460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang J, Shan Q, Liu Y, Yang H, Kuang S, He B, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang T, Glaser KJ, Zhu C, Chen J, Yin M, Venkatesh SK, Ehman RL. 3D MR elastography of hepatocellular carcinomas as a potential biomarker for predicting tumor recurrence. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49:719–730. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Asrani SK. Incorporation of noninvasive measures of liver fibrosis into clinical practice: diagnosis and prognosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:2190–2204. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li X, Das A, Bi D. Mechanical heterogeneity in tissues promotes rigidity and controls cellular invasion. Phys Rev Lett. 2019;123:058101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.058101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tissot FS, Estrach S, Boulter E, Cailleteau L, Tosello L, Seguin L, Pisano S, Audebert S, Croce O, Féral CC. Dermal fibroblast SLC3A2 deficiency leads to premature aging and loss of epithelial homeostasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138:2511–2521. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Estrach S, Lee S-A, Boulter E, Pisano S, Errante A, Tissot FS, Cailleteau L, Pons C, Ginsberg MH, Féral CC. CD98hc (SLC3A2) loss protects against ras-driven tumorigenesis by modulating integrin-mediated mechanotransduction. Cancer Res. 2014;74:6878–6889. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Digomann D, Kurth I, Tyutyunnykova A, Chen O, Löck S, Gorodetska I, Peitzsch C, Skvortsova I-I, Negro G, Aschenbrenner B, Eisenhofer G, Richter S, Heiden S, Porrmann J, Klink B, Schwager C, Dowle AA, Hein L, Kunz-Schughart LA, Abdollahi A, Lohaus F, Krause M, Baumann M, Linge A, Dubrovska A. The CD98 heavy chain is a marker and regulator of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma radiosensitivity. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:3152–3163. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jiang L, Kon N, Li T, Wang S-J, Su T, Hibshoosh H, Baer R, Gu W. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression. Nature. 2015;520:57–62. doi: 10.1038/nature14344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Qiang Z, Dong H, Xia Y, Chai D, Hu R, Jiang H. Nrf2 and STAT3 alleviates ferroptosis-mediated IIR-ALI by regulating SLC7A11. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:5146982. doi: 10.1155/2020/5146982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang L, Liu Y, Du T, Yang H, Lei L, Guo M, Ding H-F, Zhang J, Wang H, Chen X, Yan C. ATF3 promotes erastin-induced ferroptosis by suppressing system Xc. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:662–675. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0380-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yu Z, Wang H, Fang Y, Lu L, Li M, Yan B, Nie Y, Teng C. Molecular chaperone HspB2 inhibited pancreatic cancer cell proliferation via activating p53 downstream gene RPRM, BAI1, and TSAP6. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121:2318–2329. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Johnson DB, Reynolds KL, Sullivan RJ, Balko JM, Patrinely JR, Cappelli LC, Naidoo J, Moslehi JJ. Immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities: systems-based approaches to improve patient care and research. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:e398–e404. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30107-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vining KH, Mooney DJ. Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:728–742. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data associated with this study are present in the paper or the Additional files.