Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;101(1):68–76. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14293

TABLE 2.

Age of women, indication for hysterectomy, year of injury, type of medical expert, and hysterectomy approach in hysterectomies with ureteric injury reported to NPE a (2009–2019) (N = 69)

Total Approved compensation Denied compensation

N (%)

69

n (%)

10 (14.5)

n (%)

59 (85.5)

Year of injury NA NA
Before 2010 24 (34.8)
2010–2014 25 (36.2)
2015–2019 20 (29.0)
Age (years), mean ± SD 48.1 ± 8.9
<30 1 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.5)
31–40 11 (15.9) 2 (2.9) 9 (13.0)
41–50 38 (55.1) 6 (8.7) 32 (46.4)
51–60 12 (17.4) 1 (1.5) 11 (15.9)
>61 7 (10.2) 1 (1.5) 6 (8.7)
Preoperative diagnosis
Benign 62 (89.9) 9 (13.0) 53 (76.8)
Malignant 7 (10.2) 1 (1.5) 6 (8.7)
Medical experts evaluating the case b
Gynecologist 63 (91.3) 7 (10.2) 56 (81.2)
Urologist 9 (13.0) 3 (4.4) 6 (8.7)
General surgeon 1 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.5)
Other 4 (5.8) 0 (0.0) 4 (5.8)
Hysterectomy approach
Laparotomy 34 (49.3) 7 (10.1) 27 (39.1)
Laparoscopy 29 (42.0) 3 (4.3) 26 (37.7)
Vaginal 6 (8.7) 0 (0.0) 6 (8.7)
a

NPE, the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation.

b

In some cases more than one specialist evaluated the case.