Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;101(6):564–576. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14333

TABLE 2.

Summary of findings comparing intended cesarean section with vaginal delivery

Outcomes Study design (number of patients)

Relative effect

Risk ratio (95% CI)

Absolute effects a Certainty of evidence GRADE b
Perinatal outcomes
Perinatal mortality

1 RCT (n = 2078)

21 non‐RCT (n = 388 714)

RR 0.27 c (0.076; 0.974)

RR 0.36 (0.25; 0.51)

0.3 vs. 1.1%

0.05% vs. 0.19%

Low d ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Apgar score <7 at 5 min

1 RCT (n = 2033)

18 non‐RCT (n = 217 024)

RR 0.27 (0.12; 0.58)

RR 0.1 (0.14; 0.26)

0.8% vs. 3.0%

0.45% vs. 2.50%

Moderate e ⊕⊕⊕⃝
Apgar score <4 at 5 min 5 non‐RCT (n = 44 498) RR 0.39 (0.19; 0.81) 0.20% vs. 0.55% Low ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Umbilical cord pH <7.0 (in our PICO <7.05 but <7.0 was reported in all articles) 4 non‐RCT (n = 13 440) RR 0.23 (0.12; 0.43) 0.26% vs. 1.23% Low f ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Base excess < −12 1 non‐RCT (n = 1684) RR 0.14 (0.08; 0.24) 1.7% vs. 11.9% Low ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, >4 days

1 RCT (n = 2000)

4 non‐RCT (n = 46 055)

RR 0.67 (0.19; 2.36)

RR 0.73 (0.57; 0.92)

0.4% vs. 0.6%

2.45% vs. 3.72%

Low g ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Traumatic birth injury

1 RCT (n = 2000)

9 non‐RCT (n = 145 068)

RR 0.43 (0.17; 1.11)

RR 0.18 (0.13; 0.27)

0.6% vs. 1.4%

0.20% vs. 0.67%

Low g ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy Not reported
Cerebral palsy >2 years 3 non‐RCT (n = 26 155) RR 1.03 (0.53; 2.01) 0.13% vs. 0.13% Low ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Intracranial bleeding 3 non‐RCT (n = 27 192) RR 0.24 (0.05; 1.08) 0.02% vs. 0.11% Low ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Neurodevelopmental problems Reported in a wide variation of outcomes, see Table S2.
Maternal outcomes
Maternal mortality

1 RCT (n = 2083)

4 non‐RCT (n = 40 854)

RR 0.33

(0.01; 8.18)

RR 0.15

(0.01; 2.93)

0% vs. 0.10%

0% vs. 0.02%

Very low h ⊕⃝⃝⃝
Thrombo‐embolic event 4 non‐RCT (n = 40 854)

RR 1.25

(0.56; 2.80)

0.08% vs. 0.05%

Low

⊕⊕⃝⃝

Pelvic infection 2 non‐RCT (n = 30 380)

RR 1.03

(0.67; 1.56)

1.2% vs. 1.2%

Low

⊕⊕⃝⃝

Severe bleeding Reported in a wide variation of outcomes, see Table S3.
Delivery tract trauma Reported in a wide variation of outcomes, see Table S3.
Pelvic floor dysfunction (3 months and 2 years follow up)

Reported in a wide variation of outcomes, see Table S3.

The only significant differences were “having experienced urinary incontinence or incontinence of flatus” at 3 months.

Placental or uterine complications in following pregnancies Reported in a wide variation of outcomes, see Table S3.
Other outcomes
Conversion of delivery mode from cesarean section to vaginal delivery 1 RCT (n = 2088) Not relevant 9.6% Low i ⊕⊕⃝⃝
Conversion of delivery mode from vaginal delivery to cesarean section

1 RCT (n = 2088)

9 non‐RCT (n = 48 675)

Not relevant

43.3%

16%–51% (mean 38.0% median 41.8%)

Moderate j ⊕⊕⊕⃝
The mother's experience of delivery

Reported in a wide variation of outcomes, see Table S3.

No significant differences at 3 months and 2 years follow up.

Certainty of evidence
High certainty ⊕⊕⊕⊕ We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate certainty ⊕⊕⊕⃝ We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low certainty⊕⊕⃝ ◯ Confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low certainty ⊕⃝ ◯⃝ We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect
a

Absolute effects for event rates, presented as the sum of all events/the total numbers of participants, across the RCTs or cohort studies, respectively.

b

GRADE based primary on RCTs, or when not available on non‐RCTs.

c

Stillbirths excluded by us (n = 2).

d

Downgraded two levels due to serious limitations in study design and analysis, and serious imprecision.

e

Downgraded one level due to serious limitations in study design and uncertain precision.

f

Downgraded one level due to some limitations in study design, some uncertainty about directness, and uncertain precision.

g

Downgraded two levels due to serious limitations in study design, serious imprecision, and some uncertainty about directness.

h

Downgraded three levels due to serious limitations in study design, some uncertainty about directness, and very serious imprecision.

i

Downgraded two levels due to some limitations in study design and very serious indirectness.

j

Downgraded one level due to some limitations in study design.