Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;19(19):12424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912424

Table 4.

Stress display by different failure criteria in apical (a) and cervical (c) third of PDL.

Fail Criteria Study Force, Movement, Quantitative Stress, PDL Area
VM Toms et al. (2003) [14], lower premolar, 5205 nodes, 1674 elem. 1 N extr., 8 KPa a, 7.75 KPa c
intact periodontium
Merdji et al. (2013) [25], lower 1st molar, 557,974 elem. 10 N intr., 29.48 KPa a
intact periodontium 3 N tip., 8.96 KPa a
3 N transl., 6.78 KPa a
Shaw et al. (2004) [13], upper incisor, 20,582 nodes, 11,924 elem. extr. and intr., 2 KPa a
intact periodontium tipp., 1 KPa a
Roscoe et al. (2021) [12], premolar, 1.67 mil. elem. 0.25 N intr. a and c 1.1 KPa
intact periodontium 0.25 N tip., a and c 2.9 KPa
Moga et al. (2022) [2], lower 2nd premolar, 0.2 N intr., 0.44 KPa a, 1.51 KPa c
5.06–6.05 mil. elem. 0.96–1.07 mil. nodes 0.6 N extr., 1.33 KPa a, 5.18 KPa c
intact periodontium 1.2 N transl., 3.58 KPa a, 28.06 KPa c
0.6 N rot., 2.02 KPa a, 15.91 KPa c
0.6 N tip., 1.34 KPa a, 10.52 KPa c
reduced periodontium 8 mm 0.2 N intr., 1.22 KPa a, 4.76 KPa c
0.6 N extr., 5.42 KPa a, 21.39 KPa c
1.2 N transl., 26.28 KPa a, 117.00 KPa c
0.6 N rot., 17.86 KPa a, 71.06 KPa c
0.6 N tip., 7.29 KPa a, 43.19 KPa c
S1 and S3 Toms et al. (2003) [14], lower premolar, 5205 nodes, 1674 elem. 1 N extr., S1: 36.95 KPa a, −2.69 KPa c
intact periodontium 1 N extr., S3: 28.49 KPa a, −11.6 KPa c
Moga et al. (2021) [3], lower 2nd premolar 0.2 N intr., S3: −1.74 KPa a, −1.74 KPa c
5.06–6.05 mil. elem. 0.96–1.07 mil. nodes 0.6 N extr., S3: 14.10 KPa a, 27.99 KPa c
intact periodontium 1.2 N transl., S3: −97.79 KPa a, 93.03 KPa c
0.6 N rot., S3: −56.27 KPa a, 68.07 KPa c
0.6 N tip., S3: −18.53 KPa a, 28.89 KPa c
reduced periodontium 8 mm 0.2 N intr., S3: −21.26 KPa a, −8.80 KPa c
0.6 N extr., S3: 64.15 KPa a, 82.83 KPa c
1.2 N transl., S3: −292.4 KPa a, 260.2 KPa c
0.6 N rot., S3: −290.13 KPa a, 170.13 KPa c
0.6 N tip., S3: −109.4 KPa a, −1023.49 KPa c
Geramy et al. (2004) [15], upp. central incisor, 1.5 N tip., S1: 78.3 KPa a, −23.6 KPa c
378,884 nodes, 32,768 elem., intact periodontium 1.5 N tip., S3:−74 KPa a, −28 KPa c
reduced periodontium 8 mm 1.5 N tip., S1: 881KPa a, −395 KPa c
1.5 N tip., S3: 740 KPa a, −491 KPa c
Geramy et al. (2002) [16], upper central incisor, 1 N tip., S1: −37 KPa a, 55 KPa c
726 nodes, 475 elem., intact periodontium 1 N tip., S3: −39 KPa a, −75 KPa c
1 N intr., S1: 26 KPa a, −9 KPa c
1 N intr., S3: −29 KPa a, −12 KPa c
reduced periodontium 8 mm 1 N tip., S1: −440 KPa a, −288 KPa c
1 N tip., S3: −475 KPa a, 300KPa c
1 N intr., S1: –43 KPa a, 19 KPa c
1 N intr., S3: –47 KPa a, −23 KPa c
Hemanth et al. (2015) [7,8], upper central incisor, 0.2 N intr., S1: 1 KPa c
239,666 nodes, 148,097 elem., intact periodontium 1 N tip., S1: −16.4 KPa a
0.2 N intr., S3: −13.37 KPa a
1 N tip., S3: 16.4 KPa a
Roscoe et al. (2021) [12], premolar, 1.67 mil. elem. 0.25 N intr. a and c −5.3 KPa
intact periodontium 0.25 N tip., a and c −7.3 KPa
Pressure Hohmann et al. (2009) [17], 1st upper premolar 0.5 N intr., 4.7KPa−9.95 TPa a, 4.7 KPa c
PDL 195,881 elem., tooth 711,114 elem., intact periodontium
Hohmann et al. (2007) [18], 1st upper premolar 3 N tip., 38.84KPa a, −68.09 KPa c
PDL 152,776 elem., tooth 56,454 elem., intact periodontium
Wu et al. (2018) [6], upper canine optimal force: tip. 0.28–0.44 N,transl. 1.1–1.37 N
PDL 1263, elem., tooth 1928 elem., intact periodontium rot. 1.7–2.1 N, extr. 0.38–0.4 N
Wu et al. (2021) [10], lower incisor, canine, premolar optimal force: rot. 2.2–2.3 N, 3–3.1 N, 2.8–2.9 N
PDL 3032, 3416, 3851 elem., bone 5692 elem., intact periodontium
Wu et al. (2019) [11], upper canine optimal force: intr. 0.8–0.9 N, extr. 2.3–2.6 N
PDL 2272, elem., tooth 2101 elem., intact periodontium
Roscoe et al. (2021) [12], upper premolar, 1.67 mil. elem. 0.25 N intr. a and c −4.7 KPa
intact periodontium 0.25 N tip., a and c −5.8 KPa
Zhong et al. (2019) [5], lower 1st premolar, PDL 17575 elem. 0.25 N tip., a and c 10–20 KPa
intact periodontium