TABLE 1.
Indication | LASER | Author | Country | Design | Follow‐up a | Sample size, n | Age (years) b ; menopause status | Treatment settings | No. treatments, interval | Conclusion | Adverse events | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSM | CO2 | Pagano et al. (2021) 12 | Italy | Cohort | N/A | 20 | 58.7 ± 6.6; Postmenopausal | Internal: 30 W, stack 1–3. External: 24 W, stack 1 | 3 sessions, 1 months | Remodeling of vulvar connective tissue, improvement in vulvar epithelium trophism, and neovascularization | N/A | |
Athanasiou et al. (2016) 13 | Greece | Cohort | 3 months, first | 53 | 57.2 ± 5.4; Postmenopausal | 40 W, stack 1–3 | 3 sessions, 1 months | Significant reduction in vaginal pH, increase in Lactobacillus morphotypes and improvement in vaginal epithelia | No SAE. Transient: mild irritation of the introitus | |||
UI | Er:YAG | Lapii et al. (2017) 14 | Russia | Cohort | 2 months, last | 98 | 49.0 ± 12.5; N/A | 2940 nm | 2 sessions, 1–1.5 months | Neo‐collagengenesis. Elastogenesis. Neo‐angiogenesis. Reduction of epithelial degeneration and atrophy. Improvement in fibroblast population | N/A | |
Lapii et al. (2017) 15 | Russia | Cohort | 2 months, last | 18 | 49 ± 12.5; N/A | 2940 nm | N/A | Significant improvement in Ki‐67‐labeled nuclei. Epithelial proliferative activity. Neocollagenogenesis. Neoangiogenesis. High concentration of elastic fibers | N/A | |||
VVA | CO2 | Salvatore et al. (2018) 16 | Italy | Cohort | N/A | 1 | 63; Postmenopausal | 30 W | 1 session | Thicker epithelium, and cells are larger. Connective tissue different; numerous papillae, richer in blood vessels, and many fibroblasts | N/A | |
Zerbinati et al. (2014) 17 | Italy | Other | 2 months, last | 5 | 57 (54–63); Postmenopausal | 100 mJ | 1 session | Improvement in fibroblasts and rough endoplasmatic reticulum. Thicker epithelium. Large amount of glycogen. Improvement in capillaries | No SAE | |||
Becorpi et al. (2018) 18 | Italy | Cohort | 1 months, last | 20 | 58.2; Postmenopausal | 30 W, stack 1 | N/A | High remodeling status in vaginal epithelium is demonstrated by the significant changes in inflammatory and modulatory cytokine patterns. No significant change in the bacteria | N/A | |||
Salvatore et al. (2015) 19 | Italy | Cohort | N/A | 5 | 63 (57–71); Postmenopausal | 30 W | 1 session | Changes in the epithelium and lamina propria in relation to mild ablative effects, fibroblasts activation, modifications of collagen, elastic fibers, and mucopolysaccharides in the lamina propria | N/A | |||
Er:YAG | Gaspar et al. (2020) 20 | Argentina | Cohort | 6 months, last | 10 | 60.6 ± 6.82; Postmenopausal | 6.0 J/cm2 | 2 sessions, 1 months | Improvement in epithelial thickness. Significant improvement in glycogen load, new papillae and neo‐angiogenesis in lamina propria with capillaries reaching the epithelium | No SAE |
General characteristics, findings, and adverse events in included studies. The table is sorted by (1) treatment indication, (2) LASER type, (3) year of publication and (4) author name.
Abbreviations: cm2, square centimeter(s); CO2, Carbon Dioxide LASER; Er:YAG, Erbium:Yttrium‐Aluminum‐Garnet LASER; GSM, genitourinary syndrome of menopause; J, joule; mJ, milijoule; N/A, not available or not applicable; SAE, severe adverse event(s); UI, urinary incontinence; VVA, vulvovaginal atrophy; W, watt.
Follow‐up is reported as time from initial treatment session (first) or final treatment session (last).
Age is reported in mean ± SD unless otherwise specified.