Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 8;101(1):25–36. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14263

TABLE 1.

Comparison of studies in the meta‐analysis.

Study Setting Design Time Intervention Subgroups by outcome
Who? Where? How? Duration When? Apgar HIE BPI PPH DD CP AOI
Fransen 2017 24 units, Netherlands 27 509 births/year Open cluster RCT

2 years:

1 year = pre

1 year = post

Delivery ward all staff Sim center CRM training, MOET program 1 day Only once x x x x
Lenguerrand 2019 12 units, Scotland 34 881 births/year Stepped‐wedge cluster RCT 2.5 years Delivery ward all staff In situ PROMPT training 1 day Only once x
Draycott 2006 1 unit, England 6000 births/year Retrospective cohort

6 years:

2 years = pre

1 years = train

3 years = post

Delivery ward all staff In situ NA 1 day Annually x x
Weiner 2016 1 unit, USA 6000 births/year Retrospective cohort

9 years:

2 year = pre

7 year = post

Delivery ward all staff In situ PROMPT training 1 day Annually x x x
Shoushtharian 2014 8 units, Australia 12 402 births/year Retrospective cohort

3.5 years:

18 months = pre

12 months = train

12 months = pos

Delivery ward 50% off staff NA PROMPT training 1 day NA x x
Van de ven 2016 1 unit, Netherlands 1800 births/year Retrospective cohort

100 months:

38 months pre

24 months train

38 months post

Delivery ward all staff In situ 2 scenarios NA NA x
Inglis 2011 1 unit, USA, 3800 births/year Retrospective cohort

5 years:

2.5 years = pre

2 months = train

2.5 years = post

Delivery ward all staff NA NA NA NA x
Dahlberg 2018 1 unit, Sweden, 3000 births/year Retrospective cohort

12 years:

4 years = pre, 4 years = train 4 years= post

Delivery ward all staff Sim center PROBE training 3 h Every 1.5 year x
Kumar 2018 3 units, Australia 9000 birth/year Retrospective cohort

5 years:

2 years = pre

1 year = train

2 years = post

Delivery ward all staff In situ NA 0.5 day Every 2. Year x x
Croft 2016 1 unit, England 6000 births/year Retrospective cohort

12 years:

4 years = pre

4 years = train

4 years = post

Delivery ward all staff In situ PROMPT training 1 day Annually x
Baldvinsdottir 2018 1unit, Sweden 3000 births/year Retrospective cohort

8 years:

4 years = pre

4 years = post

Delivery ward all staff In situ NA 3 h Every 1.5 year x
Egenberg 2015 1 unit, Norway 4800 births/year Retrospective cohort

3 years:

1 year = pre

1 year = train

1 year = post

Delivery ward all staff Sim center NA 6 h Annually x
Egenberg 2017 1 unit, Norway 4800 births/year Retrospective cohort

4.5 years:

2 years = pre

0.5 year = train

2 years = post

Delivery ward 80% of staff Off‐site NA NA Annually x
Lutgendorf 2017 1 unit, California NA births/year Retrospective cohort

10 months

6 months = pre

4 months = post

NA In situ NA 2 day Only once x
Markova 2012 1 unit, Denmark 3500 birth/year Retrospective cohort

5 years

2 years = pre

1 year = train

2 years = post

NA NA Include lecture, multi‐professional skills training in PPH, debrief 2.5 h NA x
Fuhrmann 2015 1 unit, Denmark, 4500 births/year Retrospective cohort

1 year: 5 months = pre

2 months = train

5 months = post

Delivery ward 95% of staff Sim center NA NA Only once x
Siassakos 2009 1 unit, UK 5500 births/year Retrospective cohort 16 years: 7 years = pre 2 years = train 7 years: = post Delivery ward 95% of staff In situ PROMPT training 1 day Annually x x
Copson 2017 1 unit, West Australia 6000 births/year Retrospective cohort 11 years: 3 years = pre, 5 years = train 3 years = post NA NA NA 1 day Annually x
Phipps 2012 1 unit, USA 9200 births/year Retrospective cohort

4 years

24 months = pre

6 months = train

18 months = post

Delivery ward 72% of staff NA 4 h CRM, 4 h Multi professional simulation training 8 h Only once x
Nielsen 2007 15 units, USA, 27 509 births/year Open cluster RCT

1 year:

2 months = prem

4 months = train

5 months = post

Delivery ward all staff In situ CRM training, (MedTeams Labor & De‐livery Team Coordination Course) NA Only once x
Riley 2011 3 units, USA, 1800/year Open cluster RCT 3 years: 1 year = pre 1 year = train 1 year = post NA In situ Webinars and simulation Team‐STEPPS 2 h 30 month 11 simulations x

X = mark the outcome/outcomes reported.

AOI, adverse outcome index; Apgar, Apgar score less than 7 at 5 min; BPI, brachial plexus injury at birth; CP, cord prolapse; DD, decision to delivery interval in emergency cesarean >30 min; HIE, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; PPH, severe blood loss and/or transfusion four or more units of red blood cells.