Table 3.
Identified Theme | Description | Subthemes | Potential Alignment with Behavior Change Wheel |
---|---|---|---|
Existence of Nutrition Policies, Standards or Guidelines | Impact of previous or ongoing initiatives on responsive feeding practices. | Existing guidelines positively affected practices and misalignment with existing guidelines. | Focuses on policy-level guidelines IF: restrictions and environmental restructuring |
Education and Training Associated with the Intervention | Sharing of nutrition information with childcare providers, with the intention of increasing knowledge and behaviors related to responsive feeding. | Time and place of training delivery, qualifications of individuals delivering training, target population of training and ongoing education and training. | Focuses on educator capability IF: education, training and enablement |
Providers’ Beliefs and Confidence in Responsive Feeding | How childcare provider perceptions of responsive feeding practices affected their willingness or ability to implement these practices. | Providers’ beliefs and provider confidence | Focuses on educator motivation IF: persuasion |
Partnership Development and Stakeholder Engagement | Individuals who were involved in some capacity of the intervention. | Institutional and community stakeholdersand involvement of families. | Focuses on educatoropportunity IF: enablement |
Availability of Resources | Importance of having tangible materials as well as monetary support to facilitate implementation or sustainability. | Financial resources, tangible resources and materials and sufficient time. | Focuses on educator opportunity IF: enablement and environmental restructuring |
IF—refers to the intervention function from the behavior change wheel theory.