Fig 3. Alignment of intended impact with measurement reported by survey respondents with an EPaCCS or with EPaCCS in planning.

Key: ‘High’ indicated that an appropriate range of measures were being used to measure the impact cited, including data on views, experiences or robust auditing methods linking individual patient outcomes to data. ‘Low’ indicated that methods had the potential to measure impact if being used robustly (e.g. on a patient by patient basis rather than aggregate routinely collected data). “Not measured’ indicated that no measure was reported. Alignment between intended impact and measures used is outlined in detail in S3 Table.