Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 25;19(19):12123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912123

Table 3.

Fully adjusted combined association between folic acid supplements (FAs) intake during pregnancy and attentional function in girls aged 7–9 y of INMA cohort study, Spain, 2003–2008.

Periconceptional Period a Second Period a Entire Pregnancy a
Attentional Network Test
(n = 793)
FAS (µg/d) n β b (95% CI) n β b (95% CI) n β b (95% CI)
HRT-SE (ms) c 400–999 129 Ref. 216 Ref. 445 Ref.
<400 425 −3.33 (−18.37; 11.62) 437 −14.25 (−29.15; 0.64) 215 −15.85 (−32.61; 0.91)
≥1000 239 −3.22 # (−30.25; 23.81) 140 −7.49 # (−42.23; 27.25) 133 −20.38 * (−39.12; −1.63)
Accuracy 400–999 129 Ref. 216 Ref. 445 Ref.
<400 425 −0.00 (−0.01; 0.01) 437 0.00 (−0.00; 0.01) 215 −0.00 (−0.01; 0.00)
≥1000 239 0.00 (−0.00; 0.01) 140 0.00 (−0.00; 0.01) 133 −0.00 (−0.01; 0.01)
Commission errors (num) c 400–999 129 Ref. 216 Ref. 445 Ref.
<400 425 1.00 # (0.64; 1.35) 437 0.88 (0.75; 1.04) 215 0.98 (0.82; 1.18)
≥1000 239 0.93 (0.76; 1.14) 140 0.88 (0.72; 1.08) 133 0.97 (0.79; 1.19)
Omission errors (num) c 400–999 129 Ref. 216 Ref. 445 Ref.
<400 425 1.21 (0.95; 1.54) 437 1.03 # (0.58; 1.84) 215 0.85 (0.66; 1.09)
≥1000 239 0.93 (0.72; 1.22) 140 0.97 # (0.46; 2.03) 133 0.75 (0.49; 1.16)
Alerting c 400–999 129 Ref. 216 Ref. 445 Ref.
<400 425 −17.93 (−39.81; 3.95) 437 30.01 (12.96; 47.01) * 215 8.96 (−11.55; 29.48)
≥1000 239 −16.14 (−38.53; 6.25) 140 6.23 (−10.86; 23.32) 133 −0.41 (−21.04; 20.23)
400–999 129 Ref. 216 Ref. 445 Ref.
Orienting c <400 425 −18.07 # (−42.59; 6.44) 437 4.37 (−11.06; 19.80) 215 3.80 (−14.72; 22.31)
≥1000 239 −12.47 (−29.91; 4.97) 140 13.27 (−4.56; 31.10) 133 7.65 (−11.74; 27.04)
400–999 129 Ref. 216 Ref. 445 Ref.
Conflict (ms) c <400 425 7.88 (−5.98; 21.73) 437 1.74 (−11.32; 14.81) 215 5.06 (−9.98; 20.11)
≥1000 239 11.60 (−3.51; 26.71) 140 1.77 (−12.15; 15.69) 133 3.70 (−12.04; 19.44)
N-back task (n = 639)
d’ number 2-back 400–999 107 Ref. 168 Ref. 106 Ref.
<400 336 −0.01 (−0.25; 0.23) 343 −0.06 (−0.29; 0.18) 351 0.21 (−0.05; 0.46)
≥1000 196 0.00 (−0.26; 0.26) 128 0.09 (−0.18; 0.36) 182 0.28 * (0.01; 0.56)
d’ number 3-back 400–999 107 Ref. 168 Ref. 106 Ref.
<400 336 −0.06 (−0.27; 0.16) 343 0.14 (−0.07; 0.34) 351 0.12 (−0.11; 0.34)
≥1000 196 0.09 (−0.14; 0.32) 128 0.14 (−0.10; 0.37) 182 0.32 * (0.08; 0.56)

a Models were adjusted by energy intake (in kilocalories), dietary folate intake per 100 µg/d increase, cohort, social class (I + II (high), III or IV + V (low)), educational level (primary or less, secondary, or university), parity (0 or ≥1), tobacco exposition during the periconceptional period (no or yes), mother’s age (in years), mother’s BMI (continuous), father’s BMI (continuous), and child’s age at 7 y follow-up examination (in years). b Robust linear regression model was used for hit reaction time and hit reaction time SE (HRT-SE). Negative binomial regression model was used for commission and omission errors (estimates are incidence rate ratios, IRR). Tobit regression model was used for N-back task outcomes and accuracy. c Higher scores means lower performance. * p-value < 0.05. # I2 > 50%, random models were used.