Table 8.
ItemH | #ac | #vi | #vi/#ac | maxvi | sum | sum/#ac | zmax | #zsig | crit | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This is my water scheme. (PO_002) | 0.53 | 11.00 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 42.00 |
I sense that this water scheme is our water scheme. (PO_005) | 0.56 | 10.00 | 2.00 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.45 | 0.04 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 90.00 |
I feel a very high degree of personal ownership for this water scheme. (PO_008) | 0.48 | 8.00 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.06 | 1.90 | 1.00 | 158.00 |
I sense that this is my water scheme. (PO_011) | 0.57 | 9.00 | 2.00 | 0.22 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.06 | 1.90 | 1.00 | 161.00 |
This is our water scheme. (PO_014) | 0.52 | 10.00 | 2.00 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 78.00 |
Note: N = 328. No significant violations were identified. Abbreviations: ItemH = Item homogeneity value; #ac = number of active pairs; #vi = number of violations; #vi/#ac = average number of violations per active pair; maxvi = largest violation of manifest monotonicity; sum = sum of violations of manifest monotonicity; sum/#ac = average violation per active pair; zmax = maximum z-value; #zsig = number of significant z-values; crit = crit value.