Skip to main content
. 1999 Jan;6(1):89–95. doi: 10.1128/cdli.6.1.89-95.1999

TABLE 1.

Differences due to reagent sources in cytokine and soluble activation marker levels in plasma from HIV-positive subjects

Analyte (units of concn) Commercial kit (type) from: n Mean level ± SD P value (paired t test) Pearson’s correlation coefficient
β2M (mg/liter) Pharmacia (EIA) 14 3.00 ± 1.25 0.0004a 0.66a
Abbott (MEIA) 1.91 ± 0.70 0.0099b 0.58b
ORGenTec (EIA) 2.25 ± 1.00 0.0085c 0.91c
Neopterin (nmol/liter) ICN (EIA) 17 28.1 ± 13.2 0.00001 0.95
BRAHMS (RIA) 22.2 ± 10.9
sIL-2R (pg/ml) Endogen (EIA) 20 8,708 ± 6,118 0.00002 0.58
Immunotech (EIA) 2,205 ± 1,295
sTNF-RII (ng/ml) HyCult (EIA) 42 4.59 ± 1.59 0.00001 0.96
Genzyme (EIA) 3.82 ± 1.97
TNF-α (pg/ml) Innogenetics (EIA) 35 335.8 ± 435 0.1032 0.91
Medgenix (EIA) 398.0 ± 638
IFN-γ (units/liter) Immunotech (EIA) 12 532 ± 598 0.0166 0.98
T-Cell Diagnostics (EIA) 452 ± 532
IL-10 (pg/ml) Immunotech (EIA) 23 49.8 ± 30.1 0.00004 0.03
Endogen (EIA) 12.6 ± 9.3
a

Pharmacia β2M versus Abbott β2M. 

b

Pharmacia β2M versus ORGentec β2M. 

c

ORGentec β2M versus Abbott β2M.