Skip to main content
. 2022 May 4;30(11):3871–3880. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06989-2

Table 3.

Diagnostic accuracy of six syndesmosis tests and clinical suspicion for injury of the syndesmosis ligaments in 150 athletes with an acute ankle injury. MR imaging was used as reference standard

Positive findings Sensitivity % Specificity % LR+  LR− PPV % NPV % AUC
Syndesmosis tests
 Tenderness AITFL 78/150 (0.52) 58 (37–76) 49 (40–58) 1.14 (0.78–1.65) 0.86 (0.54–1.37) 19 (12–30) 85 (74–92) 0.52 (0.43–0.61)
 Squeeze test 38/150 (0.25) 46 (27–66) 79 (71–86) 2.20 (1.29–3.77) 0.68 (0.48–0.98) 32 (18–49) 88 (80–93) 0.60 (0.49–0.71)
 NWB DF ER test 74/148 (0.50) 58 (37–76) 52 (42–61) 1.19 (0.82–1.74) 0.82 (0.52–1.30) 20 (12–32) 85 (75–92) 0.53 (0.44–0.62)
 WB DF ER test 99/149 (0.66) 69 (48–85) 34 (26–43) 1.05 (0.79–1.40) 0.90 (0.49–1.65) 18 (11–27) 84 (70–92) 0.51 (0.42–0.61)
 Fibular translation test 26/147 (0.18) 15 (5–36) 82 (74–88) 0.85 (0.32–2.25) 1.03 (0.87–1.22) 15 (5–36) 82 (74–88) 0.49 (0.37–0.61)
 Cotton test 21/139 (0.15) 27 (12–48) 88 (80–93) 2.17 (0.98–4.84) 0.83 (0.66–1.06) 33 (15–57) 84 (76–90) 0.59 (0.45–0.73)
 All tests negative 35/147 (0.23) 23 (10–44) 76 (67–83) 0.96 (0.45–2.08) 1.01 (0.82–1.26) 17 (7–34) 82 (74–88) 0.50 (0.37–0.62)
Clinical suspicion
 Syndesmosis injury 79/143 (0.55) 73 (52–88) 49 (39–58) 1.43 (1.06–1.91) 0.55 (0.29–1.06) 24 (15–35) 89 (78–95) 0.61 (0.49–0.73)

The prevalence of acute syndesmosis injuries and the diagnostic values of six syndesmosis tests (including the combination of these six tests) and clinical suspicion are presented. All values are presented with 95% confidence interval (95% CI); positive likelihood ratio (LR +); negative likelihood ratio (LR-); positive predictive value (PPV); negative predictive value (NPV)