Table 4.
Criteria | Met | Percent met | Visual capabilities characterized | Predictions on peripheral-vision usage | Peripheral-vision manipulation | Attentional manipulation | Peripheral vision manipulation check | Compares foveal and peripheral vision | Compares with limited peripheral vision | Different attentional load/demands | Discussions based on own results | Functionalities discussed | Effects on actions discussed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visual capabilities characterized | 15 | 25.00 | 100.00 | 46.67 | 66.67 | 20.00 | 46.67 | 60.00 | 13.33 | 26.67 | 100.00 | 66.67 | 46.67 |
Predictions on peripheral-vision usage | 19 | 31.67 | 36.84 | 100.00 | 73.68 | 42.11 | 57.89 | 52.63 | 31.58 | 47.37 | 89.47 | 63.16 | 68.42 |
Peripheral-vision manipulation | 27 | 45.00 | 37.04 | 51.85 | 100.00 | 29.63 | 51.85 | 70.37 | 25.93 | 33.33 | 92.59 | 66.67 | 59.26 |
Attentional manipulation | 21 | 35.00 | 14.29 | 38.10 | 38.10 | 100.00 | 28.57 | 33.33 | 19.05 | 85.71 | 66.67 | 52.38 | 28.57 |
Peripheral vision manipulation check | 17 | 28.33 | 41.18 | 64.71 | 82.35 | 35.29 | 100.00 | 76.47 | 41.18 | 35.29 | 94.12 | 82.35 | 70.59 |
Comparison foveal and peripheral vision | 21 | 35.00 | 42.86 | 47.62 | 90.48 | 33.33 | 61.90 | 100.00 | 19.05 | 38.10 | 95.24 | 76.19 | 61.90 |
Comparison with and without (or limited) peripheral vision | 8 | 13.33 | 25.00 | 75.00 | 87.50 | 50.00 | 87.50 | 50.00 | 100.00 | 37.50 | 100.00 | 87.50 | 87.50 |
Differences attentional load/demands | 24 | 40.00 | 16.67 | 37.50 | 37.50 | 75.00 | 25.00 | 33.33 | 12.50 | 100.00 | 66.67 | 41.67 | 20.83 |
Discussions based on own results | 50 | 83.33 | 30.00 | 34.00 | 50.00 | 28.00 | 32.00 | 40.00 | 16.00 | 32.00 | 100.00 | 62.00 | 48.00 |
Functionalities discussed | 36 | 60.00 | 27.78 | 33.33 | 50.00 | 30.56 | 38.89 | 44.44 | 19.44 | 27.78 | 86.11 | 100.00 | 63.89 |
Effects on actions discussed | 25 | 41.67 | 28.00 | 52.00 | 64.00 | 24.00 | 48.00 | 52.00 | 28.00 | 20.00 | 96.00 | 92.00 | 100.00 |
In column 1, the 11 criteria are listed. In columns 2 and 3, the number and percentage of studies meeting the criteria are displayed, respectively. In columns 4–14, the studies that met each criterion are further characterized. Percentages below 100% in a given row show the percentages of papers that met one of the other criteria. As an example, 46.67% of the papers that characterized visual capabilities also made predictions on peripheral vision usage (first criteria line, column 5)